Kozera v. Target

Filing 25

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on July 6, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 16-CV-01835-LHK EDWARD KOZERA, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff’s Attorney: Adam Stirrup Defendant’s Attorney: Gail Trabish An initial case management conference was held on July 6, 2016. A further case management conference is set for October 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case management statement by October 5, 2016. 21 22 23 The Court GRANTED the petition for an order appointing Stan Kozera as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will govern this case. 24 The Court set the following case schedule: 25 Scheduled Event Date Deadline to Complete Mediation 26 September 23, 2016 27 28 1 Case No. 16-CV-01835-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 2 Further Case Management Conference October 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. Close of Fact Discovery 1 December 9, 2016 Opening Expert Reports December 30, 2016 3 Rebuttal Expert Reports January 17, 2017 4 Close of Expert Discovery February 1, 2017 5 Last Day to File Dispositive Motions (one per side in the entire case) Motions: February 9, 2017 Oppositions: February 23, 2017 Reply: March 2, 2017 7 Hearing on Dispositive Motions March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. 8 Final Pretrial Conference April 13, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. Jury Trial April 24, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Length of Trial 5 days 6 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: July 6, 2016 14 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 16-CV-01835-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?