Kozera v. Target
Filing
25
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on July 6, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 16-CV-01835-LHK
EDWARD KOZERA,
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Adam Stirrup
Defendant’s Attorney: Gail Trabish
An initial case management conference was held on July 6, 2016. A further case
management conference is set for October 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint
case management statement by October 5, 2016.
21
22
23
The Court GRANTED the petition for an order appointing Stan Kozera as guardian ad
litem for Plaintiff.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will govern this case.
24
The Court set the following case schedule:
25
Scheduled Event
Date
Deadline to Complete Mediation
26
September 23, 2016
27
28
1
Case No. 16-CV-01835-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
2
Further Case Management Conference
October 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
Close of Fact Discovery
1
December 9, 2016
Opening Expert Reports
December 30, 2016
3
Rebuttal Expert Reports
January 17, 2017
4
Close of Expert Discovery
February 1, 2017
5
Last Day to File Dispositive Motions
(one per side in the entire case)
Motions: February 9, 2017
Oppositions: February 23, 2017
Reply: March 2, 2017
7
Hearing on Dispositive Motions
March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
8
Final Pretrial Conference
April 13, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
Jury Trial
April 24, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.
Length of Trial
5 days
6
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: July 6, 2016
14
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 16-CV-01835-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?