Singh v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 12 . Motion to Dismiss 9 set for 8/10/2016 01:00 PM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Responses due by 7/11/2016. Replies due by 7/29/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/20/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016)
1 Steven J. Brewer, Esq. State Bar No. 94889
GWILLIAM IVARY CHIOSSO CAVALLI & BREWER
2 1999 Harrison St., Suite 1600
Oakland, CA 94612
3
Phone: (510)832-5411
4 Fax: (510)832-1918
Email: sbrewer@giccb.com
5
Omar I. Habbas, Esq. State Bar No. 126629
6 HABBAS, NASSERI & ASSOCIATES
7 675 North First Street, Suite 1000
San Jose, California 95112
8 Phone: (408)278-0400
Fax: (408)278-0488
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10 MONTIE SINGH
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
MONTIE SINGH,
Case No.: 16-CV-01919-NC
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER
FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
17
18
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant.
19
Date: July 27, 2016
Time: 1:00 p.m.
Judge: Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins
20
21
22
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff Montie Singh and Defendant United States of America hereby stipulate and
request this Court continue the scheduled hearing on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss from
July 27, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. to August 24, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, 280 South
1st Street, San Jose, California, 95133.
28
STIP AND ORDER
1
CASE NO. 16-CV-01919-NC
1
The Plaintiff has not yet filed his opposition papers to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
2 Pursuant to the continued hearing date, the parties stipulate that Plaintiff’s opposition papers will
3 be due July 11, 2016.
4
As Assistant United States Attorney James Scharf will be away on annual leave from July
5 8 through July 18, 2016, the parties stipulate that the Defendant’s reply papers will be due July
6 29, 2016.
7 Dated: June 20, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
8
By: /s/ Steven J. Brewer
Steven J. Brewer (SBN 94889)
GWILLIAM, IVARY, CHIOSSO,
CAVALLI & BREWER
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1600
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: (510)832-5411
Fax: (510)832-1918
Email: sbrewer@giccb.com
9
10
11
12
13
14
Attorney for Plaintiff MONTIE
SINGH
15
16
17
18
By: /s/ James A. Scharf
Brian J. Stretch (SBN 163973)
United States Attorney
Sara Winslow ( SBN 457643)
Chief, Civil Division
James A. Scharf (SBN 152171 )
Assistant United States Attorney
150 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 900
San Jose, California 95113
Phone: (408) 535-5044
Fax: (408) 535-5081
Email:james.scharf@usdoj.gov
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Attorney for Defendant UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA
26
27
28
STIP AND ORDER
2
CASE NO. 16-CV-01919-NC
1
DECLARATION OF CONSENT
2
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under
3 penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the
4 above-listed counsel for Plaintiff Montie Singh and Defendant United States of America.
5
6 Dated: June 20, 2016
/s/ Steven J. Brewer
Steven J. Brewer
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP AND ORDER
3
CASE NO. 16-CV-01919-NC
MODIFIED ORDER
1
2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
3 the Hearing for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) is continued from Wednesday, July
4 27, 2016, at 1:00 p.m. to Wednesday, August 10, 2016, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor,
5 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California, 95133. Plaintiff’s opposition papers are due July 11,
6 2016, and the Defendant’s reply papers are due July 29, 2016.
7
8
S
UNIT
ED
RT
U
O
9 Dated: June 20, 2016
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
____________________________________
10
United States District Judge
NO
13
RT
ER
Cousins
15
16
A
H
14
.
hanael M
udge Nat
J
LI
12
FO
11
R NIA
ERED
O ORD
SM. Cousins D
Hon. Nathanael
IT IS
DIFIE
AS MO
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP AND ORDER
4
CASE NO. 16-CV-01919-NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?