Singh v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 12 . Motion to Dismiss 9 set for 8/10/2016 01:00 PM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Responses due by 7/11/2016. Replies due by 7/29/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/20/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 Steven J. Brewer, Esq. State Bar No. 94889 GWILLIAM IVARY CHIOSSO CAVALLI & BREWER 2 1999 Harrison St., Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94612 3 Phone: (510)832-5411 4 Fax: (510)832-1918 Email: sbrewer@giccb.com 5 Omar I. Habbas, Esq. State Bar No. 126629 6 HABBAS, NASSERI & ASSOCIATES 7 675 North First Street, Suite 1000 San Jose, California 95112 8 Phone: (408)278-0400 Fax: (408)278-0488 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 MONTIE SINGH 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 MONTIE SINGH, Case No.: 16-CV-01919-NC Plaintiff, 16 vs. STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 17 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant. 19 Date: July 27, 2016 Time: 1:00 p.m. Judge: Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins 20 21 22 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff Montie Singh and Defendant United States of America hereby stipulate and request this Court continue the scheduled hearing on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss from July 27, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. to August 24, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California, 95133. 28 STIP AND ORDER 1 CASE NO. 16-CV-01919-NC 1 The Plaintiff has not yet filed his opposition papers to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. 2 Pursuant to the continued hearing date, the parties stipulate that Plaintiff’s opposition papers will 3 be due July 11, 2016. 4 As Assistant United States Attorney James Scharf will be away on annual leave from July 5 8 through July 18, 2016, the parties stipulate that the Defendant’s reply papers will be due July 6 29, 2016. 7 Dated: June 20, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 8 By: /s/ Steven J. Brewer Steven J. Brewer (SBN 94889) GWILLIAM, IVARY, CHIOSSO, CAVALLI & BREWER 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510)832-5411 Fax: (510)832-1918 Email: sbrewer@giccb.com 9 10 11 12 13 14 Attorney for Plaintiff MONTIE SINGH 15 16 17 18 By: /s/ James A. Scharf Brian J. Stretch (SBN 163973) United States Attorney Sara Winslow ( SBN 457643) Chief, Civil Division James A. Scharf (SBN 152171 ) Assistant United States Attorney 150 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 900 San Jose, California 95113 Phone: (408) 535-5044 Fax: (408) 535-5081 Email:james.scharf@usdoj.gov 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 26 27 28 STIP AND ORDER 2 CASE NO. 16-CV-01919-NC 1 DECLARATION OF CONSENT 2 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 3 penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the 4 above-listed counsel for Plaintiff Montie Singh and Defendant United States of America. 5 6 Dated: June 20, 2016 /s/ Steven J. Brewer Steven J. Brewer 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP AND ORDER 3 CASE NO. 16-CV-01919-NC MODIFIED ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 3 the Hearing for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) is continued from Wednesday, July 4 27, 2016, at 1:00 p.m. to Wednesday, August 10, 2016, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, 5 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California, 95133. Plaintiff’s opposition papers are due July 11, 6 2016, and the Defendant’s reply papers are due July 29, 2016. 7 8 S UNIT ED RT U O 9 Dated: June 20, 2016 S DISTRICT TE C TA ____________________________________ 10 United States District Judge NO 13 RT ER Cousins 15 16 A H 14 . hanael M udge Nat J LI 12 FO 11 R NIA ERED O ORD SM. Cousins D Hon. Nathanael IT IS DIFIE AS MO N D IS T IC T R OF C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP AND ORDER 4 CASE NO. 16-CV-01919-NC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?