Rachelle Ridola v. Arena Hotel Investments, Inc. et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/27/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2017)
1
3
4
LAW OFFICE OF IRENE KARBELASHVILI
Irene Karbelashvili, State Bar Number 232223
Irakli Karbelashvili, State Bar Number 302971
12 South First Street, Suite 413
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 295-0137
Fax: (408) 295-0142
ANDERIES & GOMES LLP
Shane K. Anderies (SBN 215415)
Allan J. Gomes (SBN 225810)
601 Montgomery Street, Suite 888
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 217-8802
Facsimile: (415) 217-8803
Attorneys for RACHELLE RIDOLA, Plaintiff
2
Attorneys for Defendants
ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC.,
MILL VALLEY MOTEL
INVESTMENTS, INC.,
MORGAN HILL MOTE
INVESTMENTS, INC.,
and NEEDLES MOTEL INVESTMENTS,
LLC
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
RACHELLE RIDOLA,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
vs.
ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., a
California corporation, MILL VALLEY
MOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., a
California corporation, MORGAN HILL
MOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., a
California corporation, and NEEDLES
MOTEL INVESTMENTS, LLC, a
California limited liability company,
collectively d/b/a ARENA HOTEL; and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
24
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:16-cv-01934-NC
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
STIPULATION
25
Plaintiff RACHELLE RIDOLA (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants ARENA HOTEL
26
INVESTMENTS, INC., a California corporation, MILL VALLEY MOTEL INVESTMENTS,
27
INC., a California corporation, MORGAN HILL MOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., a California
28
corporation, and NEEDLES MOTEL INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability
Page 1 of 3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
1
company, collectively d/b/a ARENA HOTEL (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their
2
respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:
3
4
5
6
7
1. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice against Defendants pursuant to F.R.C.P.
41(a).
2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ CONSENT
DECREE (Dkt. No. 29).
3. All parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs in the action.
4. The Court clerk shall close the case file.
8
9
10
Dated: February 26, 2017
/s/ Irene Karbelashvili
Irene Karbelashvili, Attorney for
Plaintiff RACHELLE RIDOLA
Dated: February 27, 2017
/s/ Shane K. Anderies
Shane K. Anderies, Attorney for Defendants
ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC.,
MILL VALLEY MOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC.,
MORGAN HILL MOTEL
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
FILER’S ATTESTATION
19
20
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that I received the concurrence of counsel for
Defendants in the filing of this document.
22
By:
23
/s/ Irene Karbelashvili
IRENE KARBELASHVILI
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
Having reviewed the above stipulation for dismissal by Plaintiff RACHELLE RIDOLA
on the one hand and Defendants MILL VALLEY MOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., a California
corporation, MORGAN HILL MOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., a California corporation, and
NEEDLES MOTEL INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company, collectively
5
6
d/b/a ARENA HOTEL (collectively “Defendants”), on the other hand, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
7
1. This action is dismissed with prejudice against Defendants.
8
2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ CONSENT
DECREE (Dkt. No. 29).
9
10
3. All parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs in the action.
11
4. The Court clerk shall close the case file.
12
S
NO
17
RT
18
T
thanael
Judge Na
19
20
s
A
H
ER
M. Cousin
R NIA
16
GRAN
FO
15
________________________________________
United States MagistrateED
Judge
LI
February 27, 2017
Dated: ____________________
UNIT
ED
14
RT
U
O
13
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?