Adkins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties are ordered to appear on 9/15/2016 at 10:00 a.m. to show cause why the court should not impose any and all appropriate sanctions for willful disobedience of a court order. The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions should not be imposed on or before 9/8/2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/31/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SAN JOSE DIVISION

7
8

NADINE ADKINS,

Case No. 5:16-cv-02150-EJD

Plaintiff,
9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION

v.
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.
On August 15, 2016, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff and all defendants who

14

have appeared in this action but have not filed a Notice of Settlement to meet and confer in order

15

to reach an agreement on an ADR process and file, within 10 days, either (1) a stipulation

16

embodying their agreement, or (2) the form entitled “Notice of Need of ADR Phone Conference.”

17

Dkt. No. 46. At the time the order issued, Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc.,

18

Seventh Avenue, Inc., and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. had appeared in this action but

19

had not filed Notices of Settlement. As of the date and time this was order was filed, neither these

20

defendants nor Plaintiff have complied and the time for compliance has expired.

21

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on

22

September 15, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 1, 5th Floor, United States District Court,

23

280 S. First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the court should not impose

24

any and all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal of this action, on the

25

parties, or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order.

26

The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions

27

should not be imposed on or before September 8, 2016. In doing so, however, they must (1)

28

1
Case No.: 5:16-cv-02150-EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

1

explain their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2)

2

must also file one of the forms contemplated by the August 15th Order.

3
4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 31, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 5:16-cv-02150-EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION