Power Integrations, Inc. v. Park

Filing 75

ORDER re Plaintiff's Response to 74 March 13, 2019 Discovery Letter. Plaintiff's response due by noon, 3/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 3/14/2019. (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 CHAN-WOONG PARK, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No.16-cv-02366-BLF (VKD) Defendant. 12 ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO MARCH 13, 2019 DISCOVERY LETTER Re: Dkt. No. 74 13 On March 13, 2019, defendant Chan-Woong Park filed a unilateral discovery letter brief, 14 claiming that plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. (“PI”) has not completed its document production 15 or served its supplemental written discovery responses, even though the parties’ agreed-upon 16 deadlines for doing so have passed. Additionally, Mr. Park says that PI has unduly delayed 17 scheduling the depositions of several witnesses. PI reportedly also refused to participate in the 18 preparation of a joint discovery letter. By noon on Friday, March 15, 2019, PI shall file a response to Mr. Park’s discovery 19 20 letter, including a substantive statement of its position on the issues, as well as its proposed 21 resolution of the dispute. PI’s letter shall comply with the word limits set forth in the 22 undersigned’s Standing Order for Civil Cases.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: March 14, 2019 25 VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 1 https://cand.uscourts.gov/filelibrary/3438/Standing-Order-for-Civil-Cases-January-2019.pdf

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?