Power Integrations, Inc. v. Park
Filing
75
ORDER re Plaintiff's Response to 74 March 13, 2019 Discovery Letter. Plaintiff's response due by noon, 3/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 3/14/2019. (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
CHAN-WOONG PARK,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.16-cv-02366-BLF (VKD)
Defendant.
12
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE
TO MARCH 13, 2019 DISCOVERY
LETTER
Re: Dkt. No. 74
13
On March 13, 2019, defendant Chan-Woong Park filed a unilateral discovery letter brief,
14
claiming that plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. (“PI”) has not completed its document production
15
or served its supplemental written discovery responses, even though the parties’ agreed-upon
16
deadlines for doing so have passed. Additionally, Mr. Park says that PI has unduly delayed
17
scheduling the depositions of several witnesses. PI reportedly also refused to participate in the
18
preparation of a joint discovery letter.
By noon on Friday, March 15, 2019, PI shall file a response to Mr. Park’s discovery
19
20
letter, including a substantive statement of its position on the issues, as well as its proposed
21
resolution of the dispute. PI’s letter shall comply with the word limits set forth in the
22
undersigned’s Standing Order for Civil Cases.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: March 14, 2019
25
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
1
https://cand.uscourts.gov/filelibrary/3438/Standing-Order-for-Civil-Cases-January-2019.pdf
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?