Moore v. Target

Filing 69

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/28/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2017)

1 CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS, ESQ. (230038)
JENNIFER LU GILBERT, ESQ. (255820)
2 CHRISTOPHER J. JUDGE, ESQ. (274418)
BANYS, P.C.
3 1032 Elwell Court, Suite 100
Palo Alto, CA 94303
4 Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
5 [e-mail]
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
KIMBERLEY A. MOORE
7
JEFFREY A. LOEW, ESQ. (274570)
8 BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE
A Professional Corporation
9 555 12th Street, Suite 1800
Oakland, CA 94607
10 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
11 [e-mail]
12 Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16 KIMBERLEY A. MOORE,
17

Plaintiff,

18 vs.
19 TARGET CORPORATION, and Does 1-30,
20

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 16-cv-02725 NC
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Complaint Filed: 11/25/15

21
22

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff KIMBERLY A. MOORE, by and

23 through her attorney of record, Christopher J. Judge, Esq., and defendant TARGET
24 CORPORATION, by and through its attorney of record, Jeffrey A. Loew, Esq., that plaintiff will
25 dismiss defendant TARGET CORPORATION with prejudice pursuant to F. R C. P. 41(a)(1), with
26 each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.
27 / / /
28 / / /
-1STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – Case No. 16-cv-02725 NC

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3 DATED: June 27, 2017
4

BANYS, P.C.

5
By: /s/ JENNIFER LU GILBERT
CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS, ESQ.
JENNIFER LU GILBERT, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER J. JUDGE, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KIMBERLY A. MOORE

6
7
8
9
10
DATED: June 20, 2017
11

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE
A Professional Corporation

12
13

By: /s/ JEFFREY A. LOEW, ESQ.
JEFFREY A. LOEW, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION

14
15
16
17

ORDER

18

23

27

ER

Cousins

LI

.
hanael M
udge Nat
J

A

H

26

RT

25

NO

27829\755131

24

R NIA

22

By: ________________________________
NANTHANAEL COUSINS
ED
UNITED STATESRANT
G MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FO

21

S

DATED: June 28, 2017

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

20

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

19

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

28
-2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – Case No. 16-cv-02725 NC

C