Kounitski v. Colvin

Filing 7

Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/3/16. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 ELENA KOUNITSKI, 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 16-CV-03018-LHK ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 14 15 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 16 Defendant. 17 18 On June 3, 2016, Plaintiff Elena Kounitski filed a complaint in this Court against 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin. This civil action is subject to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (stating that a party may obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security by filing “a civil action.”). Under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff was required to serve Defendants with the summons and complaint by September 1, 2016, which is 90 days from the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff has yet to file proof of service. Because Plaintiff has failed to file proof of service of the complaint and summons, the Court 26 hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice for 27 28 1 Case No. 16-CV-03018-LHK ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 1 failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has until November 10, 2016, to file a written response to this Order to 2 Show Cause. A hearing on this Order to Show Cause is hereby set for November 17, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. 3 Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this Order and to appear at the November 17, 2016 hearing will result 4 in dismissal of this action with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: November 3, 2016 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 16-CV-03018-LHK ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?