Kounitski v. Colvin
Filing
7
Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/3/16. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
ELENA KOUNITSKI,
13
Plaintiff,
Case No. 16-CV-03018-LHK
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
14
15
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
16
Defendant.
17
18
On June 3, 2016, Plaintiff Elena Kounitski filed a complaint in this Court against
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin. This civil action is subject to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (stating that a party may obtain judicial review of a final decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security by filing “a civil action.”). Under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff was required to serve Defendants with the summons and complaint by
September 1, 2016, which is 90 days from the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff has yet to file proof of
service.
Because Plaintiff has failed to file proof of service of the complaint and summons, the Court
26
hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice for
27
28
1
Case No. 16-CV-03018-LHK
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
1
failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has until November 10, 2016, to file a written response to this Order to
2
Show Cause. A hearing on this Order to Show Cause is hereby set for November 17, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
3
Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this Order and to appear at the November 17, 2016 hearing will result
4
in dismissal of this action with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: November 3, 2016
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 16-CV-03018-LHK
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?