Anderson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 98

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/17/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 LOWELL ANDERSON, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 Case No. 16-cv-03328-BLF ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 14 On March 8, 2017, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s first amended complaint with leave to 15 amend on or before March 29, 2017. See Order Granting Defendant Experian’s Motion to 16 Dismiss First Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend, ECF 96. Plaintiff did not file an 17 amended pleading within the time provided. 18 On March 30, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause, on or before April 13, 19 2017, why the action should not be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff did not respond by the 20 April 13 deadline and still has not responded. 21 Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 17, 2017 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?