Anderson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 98

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/17/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN JOSE DIVISION

6
7

LOWELL ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10
11

Case No. 16-cv-03328-BLF
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
13
14

On March 8, 2017, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s first amended complaint with leave to

15

amend on or before March 29, 2017. See Order Granting Defendant Experian’s Motion to

16

Dismiss First Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend, ECF 96. Plaintiff did not file an

17

amended pleading within the time provided.

18

On March 30, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause, on or before April 13,

19

2017, why the action should not be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff did not respond by the

20

April 13 deadline and still has not responded.

21

Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: April 17, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge