Franco v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 101

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 6/16/2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/26/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 9 RON FRANCO, Plaintiff, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 v. Case No. 16-cv-03335-BLF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 There are two defendants remaining in this action, On April 13, 2017, Experian 17 Information Solutions, Inc. and Credit Bureau of Placer County, Inc. With respect to Experian 18 Information Solutions, Inc., Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on April 13, 2017. Notice of 19 Settlement, ECF 90. Plaintiff stated that the parties expected to finalize a settlement within thirty 20 days. More than thirty days has elapsed and Plaintiff has neither filed a notice of dismissal nor 21 indicated that additional time is necessary to finalize the settlement. 22 The other remaining defendant, Credit Bureau of Placer County, Inc., answered the first 23 amended complaint on October 7, 2016. Answer, ECF 62. However, on April 18, 2017, the Court 24 dismissed the first amended complaint with leave to amend. Order Granting Motions to Dismiss 25 First Amended Complaint, ECF 94. Plaintiff has not filed an amended pleading and the deadline 26 to do so has elapsed. Accordingly, there is no operative pleading in this case. 27 28 Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing and on or before June 16, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to the remaining defendants, Experian Information 1 Solutions, Inc. and Credit Bureau of Placer County, Inc. in light of the circumstances described 2 above. If Plaintiff fails to respond within the time provided, the Court will presume that Plaintiff 3 has resolved all claims against these defendants and will issue an order of dismissal without 4 further notice. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 Dated: May 26, 2017 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?