Franco v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
101
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 6/16/2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/26/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
8
9
RON FRANCO,
Plaintiff,
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
v.
Case No. 16-cv-03335-BLF
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
16
There are two defendants remaining in this action, On April 13, 2017, Experian
17
Information Solutions, Inc. and Credit Bureau of Placer County, Inc. With respect to Experian
18
Information Solutions, Inc., Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on April 13, 2017. Notice of
19
Settlement, ECF 90. Plaintiff stated that the parties expected to finalize a settlement within thirty
20
days. More than thirty days has elapsed and Plaintiff has neither filed a notice of dismissal nor
21
indicated that additional time is necessary to finalize the settlement.
22
The other remaining defendant, Credit Bureau of Placer County, Inc., answered the first
23
amended complaint on October 7, 2016. Answer, ECF 62. However, on April 18, 2017, the Court
24
dismissed the first amended complaint with leave to amend. Order Granting Motions to Dismiss
25
First Amended Complaint, ECF 94. Plaintiff has not filed an amended pleading and the deadline
26
to do so has elapsed. Accordingly, there is no operative pleading in this case.
27
28
Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing and on or before June 16, 2017 why
this action should not be dismissed as to the remaining defendants, Experian Information
1
Solutions, Inc. and Credit Bureau of Placer County, Inc. in light of the circumstances described
2
above. If Plaintiff fails to respond within the time provided, the Court will presume that Plaintiff
3
has resolved all claims against these defendants and will issue an order of dismissal without
4
further notice.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
Dated: May 26, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?