Echevarria v. Aerotek, Inc. et al
Filing
70
ORDER GRANTING 49 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/3/2017.(blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2017)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
JAIME ECHEVARRIA,
Case No. 16-cv-04041-BLF
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STAY ALL
PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL
Plaintiff,
5
6
v.
7
AEROTEK, INC.,
8
[Re: ECF 49]
Defendant.
9
10
On January 3, 2017, this Court issued an order denying Defendant Aerotek, Inc.’s Motion
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
to Compel Individual Arbitration, Dismiss Class Claims, and Stay PAGA Claim. See ECF 42.
12
The Court’s ruling turned on its application of Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 834 F.3d 975 (9th
13
Cir. 2016). On January 13, 2017, the Supreme Court granted certiorari with respect to Morris.
14
See Ernst & Young v. Morris, 137 S. Ct. 809 (2017).
15
Aerotek appealed this Court’s order, see ECF 46, moved this Court to stay all proceedings
16
in this case pending disposition of its appeal, see ECF 49, and moved the Ninth Circuit to stay
17
appellate proceedings pending the Supreme Court’s resolution of Morris, see ECF 67. The Ninth
18
Circuit granted the latter motion, ordering that “[t]his case is stayed until October 10, 2017.”
19
Ninth Circuit Order, ECF 67. The Ninth Circuit directed that, on or before that date, Aerotek must
20
“file the opening brief or file a motion addressing the status of the Morris case and requesting
21
continuance of the stay or appropriate relief.” Id.
22
To the extent that the Ninth Circuit’s order does not stay proceedings in this Court,
23
Aerotek’s motion to stay all proceedings pending appeal is GRANTED. As the Ninth Circuit’s
24
stay order reflects, whether Plaintiff Jaime Echevarria may proceed with his class claims in this
25
action turns squarely on the outcome of the Supreme Court’s review of Morris.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?