Paradise v. Fay Servicing, LLC et al

Filing 14

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THAT ALL DEFENDANTS CONSENT TO REMOVAL. Re: Dkt. No. 1 . Responses due by 8/1/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/26/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL PARADISE, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. FAY SERVICING, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 16-cv-04049 NC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THAT ALL DEFENDANTS CONSENT TO REMOVAL Re: Dkt. No. 1 12 13 In this wrongful foreclosure action, plaintiff Michael Paradise has named Fay 14 Servicing, LLC, U.S. Bank, N.A., Flagstar Bank, FSB, and Does 1 through 50 as 15 defendants. Dkt. No. 1-2 at 5. Paradise brought suit in California court, and defendant 16 Flagstar removed the action to federal court. Dkt. No. 1 at 1. 17 However, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(A) requires that when a civil action is removed, 18 “all defendants who have been properly joined and served must join in or consent to the 19 removal of the action.” Here, Flagstar removed the case alone, and its attached declaration 20 does not indicate whether all properly joined and served defendants consent to removal. 21 All defendants who have been properly served must respond to this order with a 22 declaration stating that they either consent to or oppose Flagstar’s removal from state 23 court, or the case will be remanded. They must do so by August 1, 2016. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: July 26, 2016 27 28 Case No. 16-cv-04049 NC _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?