Paradise v. Fay Servicing, LLC et al
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THAT ALL DEFENDANTS CONSENT TO REMOVAL. Re: Dkt. No. 1 . Responses due by 8/1/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/26/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MICHAEL PARADISE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
FAY SERVICING, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 16-cv-04049 NC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THAT
ALL DEFENDANTS CONSENT TO
REMOVAL
Re: Dkt. No. 1
12
13
In this wrongful foreclosure action, plaintiff Michael Paradise has named Fay
14
Servicing, LLC, U.S. Bank, N.A., Flagstar Bank, FSB, and Does 1 through 50 as
15
defendants. Dkt. No. 1-2 at 5. Paradise brought suit in California court, and defendant
16
Flagstar removed the action to federal court. Dkt. No. 1 at 1.
17
However, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(A) requires that when a civil action is removed,
18
“all defendants who have been properly joined and served must join in or consent to the
19
removal of the action.” Here, Flagstar removed the case alone, and its attached declaration
20
does not indicate whether all properly joined and served defendants consent to removal.
21
All defendants who have been properly served must respond to this order with a
22
declaration stating that they either consent to or oppose Flagstar’s removal from state
23
court, or the case will be remanded. They must do so by August 1, 2016.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: July 26, 2016
27
28
Case No. 16-cv-04049 NC
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?