Johnson v. Magna et al
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 1/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/19/2017. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
RICHARD JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No.5:16-cv-04322-HRL
v.
ADNAN MAGNA, et al.,
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
Defendants.
This action was filed on August 1, 2016. There is no indication on the docket that the
18
defendants have been served, and the deadline for service has passed. Additionally, deadlines set
19
in the court’s Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans
20
With Disabilities Act Title II & III (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-89) (Dkt. 3) have lapsed. On January 4,
21
2017, the court issued an order directing plaintiff to file a status report by January 13, 2017. No
22
report has been filed.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, no later than January 31, 2017 plaintiff shall file a response to this order
showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply
1
2
3
with court orders.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 19, 2017
4
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
5:16-cv-04322-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
James Albert Sarrail
3
Monica Castillo
jsarrail@slhlawfirm.com
mcastillo@sch-lawfirm.net, abeggs@sch-lawfirm.net
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?