Johnson v. Magna et al

Filing 8

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 1/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/19/2017. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 RICHARD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No.5:16-cv-04322-HRL v. ADNAN MAGNA, et al., ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendants. This action was filed on August 1, 2016. There is no indication on the docket that the 18 defendants have been served, and the deadline for service has passed. Additionally, deadlines set 19 in the court’s Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans 20 With Disabilities Act Title II & III (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-89) (Dkt. 3) have lapsed. On January 4, 21 2017, the court issued an order directing plaintiff to file a status report by January 13, 2017. No 22 report has been filed. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, no later than January 31, 2017 plaintiff shall file a response to this order showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply 1 2 3 with court orders. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 19, 2017 4 HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 5:16-cv-04322-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 James Albert Sarrail 3 Monica Castillo jsarrail@slhlawfirm.com mcastillo@sch-lawfirm.net, abeggs@sch-lawfirm.net 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?