Choi v. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company et al
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Choi has until 9/7/2016 to file a response to Lockheed Martin's motion to dismiss. Consent or declination is due 9/7/2016. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/31/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JAY JIA WEN CHOI,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
12
13
14
Case No. 16-cv-04337 NC
Plaintiff,
11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
LOCKHEED MARTIN SPACE SYSTEMS
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
The Court instructs Plaintiff Choi to respond to defendant Lockheed Martin’s motion to
17
dismiss. Dkt. No. 7. That response was due on August 22, 2016. Choi has until September 7,
18
2016 to file a response. If Choi fails to respond to the motion by that time, the Court will grant
19
defendant’s motion to dismiss.
20
21
The Court also reminds Choi to return by September 7 the form consenting or declining
this court’s jurisdiction over this case. A copy is attached.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 31, 2016
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
JAY JIA WEN CHOI,
Case No. 16-cv-04337 NC
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION
6
7
LOCKHEED MARTIN SPACE SYSTEMS
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
8
9
INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether
you (if you are the party) or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case)
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
choose(s) to consent or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form
12
below your selection.
13
( ) Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction
14
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to
15
have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case,
16
including trial and entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment
17
shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
OR
18
19
( ) Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction
20
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United
21
States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request
22
that this case be reassigned to a United States district judge.
23
24
DATE:
NAME:
COUNSEL FOR:
(OR “PRO SE:)
25
26
__________________________________
Signature
27
28
2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
JAY JIA WEN CHOI,
Case No. 16-cv-04337-NC
Plaintiff,
7
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
LOCKHEED MARTIN SPACE SYSTEMS
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
13
14
15
16
17
That on August 31, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
18
19
20
Jay Jia Wen Choi
1101 Ridgemont Drive
Milpitas, CA 95035
21
22
Dated: August 31, 2016
23
24
25
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
26
27
28
By:________________________
Lili Harrell, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?