National Medical Services, Inc. dba NMS Labs v. INDX Lifecare, Inc.
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Re: Dkt. No. 15 . National Medical to file with the Court a brief not to exceed 10 pages addressing each of the seven Eitel factors by 4/5/2017. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 3/27/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
NATIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES,
INC.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
INDX LIFECARE, INC.,
Case No. 16-cv-04425 NC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
REGARDING MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 15
Defendant.
15
16
17
Plaintiff National Medical Services, Inc. filed a motion for default judgment against
18
19
defendant INDX Lifecare, Inc. Dkt. No. 15. In its motion, National Medical did not
20
address the factors set forth by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. McCool to assist the Court in
21
determining whether default judgment is warranted. 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir.
22
1986).
23
Those factors are: (1) the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff; (2) the merits of
24
the plaintiff’s substantive claim; (3) the sufficiency of the complaint; (4) the sum of money
25
at stake in the action; (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material facts; (6) whether
26
the default was due to excusable neglect; and (7) the strong policy favoring decisions on
27
the merits. Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471-72.
28
Case No. 16-cv-04425 NC
1
2
Thus, the Court ORDERS National Medical to file with the Court a brief not to
exceed 10 pages addressing each of the seven Eitel factors by April 5, 2017.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: March 27, 2017
7
_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 16-cv-04425 NC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?