Chavez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
55
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES, INC., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., AND CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/14/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
SOPHIA CHAVEZ,
Plaintiff,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 16-cv-04622-BLF
v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., et al.,
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS
WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES,
INC., EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., AND CREDIT ONE
BANK, N.A.
Defendants.
13
14
15
On April 17, 2017, the Court issued an order noting that Plaintiff had effected service of
16
process on Defendant Wells Fargo Card Services, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”) on August 26, 2016. See
17
Order Setting Deadline for Plaintiff to File Request for Clerk’s Entry of Default, ECF 50. The
18
Court directed Plaintiff to file a request for a Clerk’s entry of default against Wells Fargo on or
19
before May 8, 2017. Id. The court advised that “[i]f Plaintiff does not file a request for a Clerk’s
20
entry of default within the time provided, the Court will presume that Plaintiff does not intend to
21
proceed against Defendant and will dismiss the action against Defendant Wells Fargo Card
22
Services, Inc. for failure to prosecute.” Id. Plaintiff has not filed a request for a Clerk’s entry of
23
default. Accordingly, Defendant Wells Fargo is DISMISSED from this action.
24
On April 25, 2017, the Court issued an order granting motions to dismiss brought by
25
Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) and Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit
26
One”). See Order Granting Motions to Dismiss First Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend,
27
ECF 52. The Court granted Plaintiff until May 16, 2017 to amend her pleading, and stated that
28
“[f]ailure to meet the May 16 deadline to file an amended complaint or failure to cure the
1
deficiencies identified in this Order will result in a dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.”
2
Id. at 17. Plaintiff has not filed an amended pleading. Accordingly, Experian and Credit One are
3
DISMISSED from this action.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: June 14, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?