Field v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A. Show Cause Response due by 8/15/2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/1/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case No. 16-cv-04635-BLF
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
On May 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement with the last remaining defendant in
this action, Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”). See Notice of Settlement, ECF 136. On June
15, 2017, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to dismiss Credit One or file a status report
regarding settlement on or before June 29, 2017. See Order Setting Deadline, ECF 141. On June
29, 2017, the parties filed a second notice of settlement, stating they expected that settlement
would be finalized, and Credit One would be dismissed, within thirty days. Notice, ECF 142. The
thirty-day period elapsed on July 31, 2017, and Plaintiff has neither filed a notice of dismissal nor
indicated that additional time is necessary to finalize the settlement.
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing and on or before August 15,
2017 why the Court should not dismiss Credit One. If Plaintiff fails to respond within the time
provided, the Court will presume that Plaintiff has resolved all claims against Credit One and will
issue an order of dismissal without further notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 1, 2017
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?