Field v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 143

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A. Show Cause Response due by 8/15/2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/1/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2017)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

SAN JOSE DIVISION

5
6

PATRICK FIELD,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9
10

Case No. 16-cv-04635-BLF
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.

v.
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On May 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement with the last remaining defendant in

13

this action, Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”). See Notice of Settlement, ECF 136. On June

14

15, 2017, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to dismiss Credit One or file a status report

15

regarding settlement on or before June 29, 2017. See Order Setting Deadline, ECF 141. On June

16

29, 2017, the parties filed a second notice of settlement, stating they expected that settlement

17

would be finalized, and Credit One would be dismissed, within thirty days. Notice, ECF 142. The

18

thirty-day period elapsed on July 31, 2017, and Plaintiff has neither filed a notice of dismissal nor

19

indicated that additional time is necessary to finalize the settlement.

20

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing and on or before August 15,

21

2017 why the Court should not dismiss Credit One. If Plaintiff fails to respond within the time

22

provided, the Court will presume that Plaintiff has resolved all claims against Credit One and will

23

issue an order of dismissal without further notice.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: August 1, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge