Brezoczky v. Domtar Corp
Filing
70
ORDER GRANTING 69 STIPULATION TO EXTEND MOTION DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/23/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2017)
1
LEONARDMEYER LLP
Derek J. Meyer (State Bar No.)
5900 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90036
Tel: (310) 220-0331
rmeyer@leonardmeyerllp.com
POLSINELLI LLP
Noel S. Cohen (State Bar No. 219645)
2049 Century Park East, Suite 2900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: (310) 556-1801
ncohen@polsinelli.com
8
LEONARDMEYER LLP
John P. Killacky (admitted pro hac vice)
120 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 2000
Chicago, IL 60602
Tel: (312) 943-4888
jkillacky@leonardmeyerllp.com
POLSINELLI PC
Stacy A. Carpenter (admitted pro hac vice)
1401 Lawrence Street, Suite 2300
Denver, CO 80202
Tel: (303) 572-9300
scarpenter@polsinelli.com
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff Kelly Brezoczky
POLSINELLI PC
Britton L. St. Onge (admitted pro hac vice)
100 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1000
St. Louis, MO 63102
Tel: (314) 889-8000
bstonge@polsinelli.com
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants Domtar
Corporation and Polsinelli PC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION
KELLY BREZOCZKY, an individual,
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
Case No. 5:16-CV-4995-EJD
v.
DOMTAR CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation; and POLSINELLI PC, a Missouri
professional corporation,
22
THIRD STIPULATION & [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE
MOTION DEADLINES IN PRETRIAL
ORDER (JURY)
Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila
Courtroom 4, Fifth Floor
Defendants.
23
24
PLAINTIFF KELLY BREZOCZKY (“Plaintiff”) and DEFENDANT POLSINELLI PC
25
(“Polsinelli”), pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, jointly submit this stipulation asking the Court to
26
briefly extend the deadline for filing dispositive motions to be filed by either Plaintiff or Polsinelli
27
regarding Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli. The proposed date below would not impact any other
28
deadlines as described below.
-1THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE & [PROPOSED] ORDER
60776245.2
RECITALS
1
2
WHEREAS, the Court entered its Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadlines in Pretrial
3
Order on October 17, 2017 (ECF No. 60), setting an October 20, 2017 deadline to file dispositive
4
motions as to Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli;
5
6
WHEREAS, a hearing on dispositive motions is scheduled for December 7, 2017, and the case
is set for trial commencing January 23, 2018;
7
WHEREAS, the dispositive motion deadline in this case has been extended twice, once for only
8
two business days because a court reporting agency failed to appear at a previously scheduled
9
deposition, requiring the deposition to be rescheduled, and a second time, also for only two business
10
days, to permit the parties to continue negotiating a settlement of Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli;
11
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Polsinelli continue to make progress in settlement discussions, and
12
Plaintiff and Polsinelli are presently engaged in finalizing settlement documents in a mutual effort to
13
achieve a final settlement agreement;
14
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Polsinelli would like to pursue completion of a written settlement
15
agreement, but at the same time, do not want to allow the dispositive motion deadline to expire prior to
16
the execution of a settlement agreement;
17
WHEREAS, an additional brief extension of the dispositive motion deadline as to Plaintiff’s
18
claims against Polsinelli will allow them to focus on completing a settlement agreement executed by
19
Polsinelli and Plaintiff;
20
21
WHEREAS, there is good cause for extending the deadline for filing dispositive motions for
Plaintiff and Polsinelli as it relates to Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli;
22
WHEREAS, extending this deadline would not prejudice any party;
23
WHEREAS, extending the deadline for filing dispositive motions as to Plaintiff’s claims
24
against Polsinelli would not affect any other dates in the Amended Pretrial Order, including the
25
deadline for filing dispositive motions as to Plaintiff’s claims against Domtar, in the event the Court
26
accepts the proposed date below.
27
28
-2THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE & [PROPOSED] ORDER
60776245.2
1
STIPULATION
2
3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties that the deadlines for the parties to file
4
dispositive motions as to Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli PC should be extended to October 24,
5
2017.
6
Dated: October 20, 2017
LEONARDMEYER LLP
7
By: /s/ Derek J. Meyer (with consent)
Derek J. Meyer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
10
Dated: October 20, 2017
POLSINELLI PC
11
12
By: /s/ Noel S. Cohen
Noel S. Cohen
Attorneys for Defendants
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated: October 23, 2017
18
19
___________________________________________
Hon. Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE & [PROPOSED] ORDER
60776245.2
1
DECLARATION OF NOEL S. COHEN
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I, Noel S. Cohen, declare and state as follows:
1.
I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law before all courts in the State of
California, including the United States District Court for the Central District of California. I am one
of the attorneys of record for Defendants in the above-captioned matter.
2.
I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and if called as a witness, I
could and would testify competently as to those facts.
3.
The Court entered its Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadlines in Pretrial Order
on October 17, 2017 (ECF No. 60), setting an October 20, 2017 deadline to file dispositive motions
as to Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli.
4.
A hearing on dispositive motions is scheduled for December 7, 2017, and the case is set
for trial commencing January 23, 2018.
5.
The dispositive motion deadline in this case has been extended twice, once for only two
business days because a court reporting agency failed to appear at a previously scheduled deposition,
requiring the deposition to be rescheduled, and a second time, also for only two business days, to
permit the parties to continue negotiating a settlement of Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli.
6.
Plaintiff and Polsinelli continue to make progress in settlement discussions, and
Plaintiff and Polsinelli are presently engaged in finalizing settlement documents in a mutual effort to
achieve a final settlement agreement.
7.
Plaintiff and Polsinelli would like to pursue completion of a written settlement
agreement, but at the same time, do not want to allow the dispositive motion deadline to expire prior
to the execution of a settlement agreement.
8.
The parties believe that briefly extending the deadline for filing dispositive motions as
to Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli will allow them sufficient time to conclude drafting and execute
a final settlement agreement as to Plaintiff’s claims against Polsinelli.
9.
There is good cause for an extension of the dispositive motion deadline.
10.
Extending this deadline would prejudice no party.
-4THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE & [PROPOSED] ORDER
60776245.2
1
11.
Extending the deadline for filing dispositive motions as to Plaintiff’s claims against
2
Polsinelli would not affect any other dates in the Amended Pretrial Order, including the deadline for
3
filing dispositive motions as to Plaintiff’s claims against Domtar, in the event the Court accepts
4
parties’ proposal to extend that deadline to October 24, 2017.
5
6
7
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct.
8
9
Executed on October 20, 2017 at Los Angeles, California.
10
/s/ Noel S. Cohen
11
Noel S. Cohen
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE & [PROPOSED] ORDER
60776245.2
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; I am employed by POLSINELLI
3
LLP in the County of Los Angeles, California at 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2900, Los Angeles,
4
California 90067.
5
On October 20, 2017, I served the foregoing document(s) described as:
6
7
THIRD STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION
DEADLINES IN PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY)
8
on the interested parties in this action by:
9
[X]
By CM/ECF: I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically filed the foregoing with the
10
Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the email
11
addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail notice list, and I hereby certify that I have mailed the
12
foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF participants (if
13
any) indicated on the Manual Notice list/Service List.
14
[X]
15
the laws of the United States of America that the above is true and correct.
16
Executed on October 20, 2017, at Los Angeles, California.
(Federal) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and under
17
/s/ Noel S. Cohen
18
Noel S. Cohen
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE & [PROPOSED] ORDER
60776245.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?