Brezoczky v. Domtar Corp

Filing 84

ORDER GRANTING 79 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/5/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

LEONARDMEYER LLP
Derek J. Meyer (State Bar No. 278346)
5900 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90036
Tel: [phone]
[e-mail]

8

LEONARDMEYER LLP
John P. Killacky (admitted pro hac vice)
120 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 2000
Chicago, IL 60602
Tel: [phone]
[e-mail]

9

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kelly Brezoczky

6
7

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

13

KELLY BREZOCZKY, an individual,

14

Plaintiff,

15

v.

16
17
18

DOMTAR CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.

Case No. 5:16-CV-4995-EJD
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS A AND B TO THE
DECLARATION OF M. MONICA IP
Judge:
Courtroom:

Hon. Edward J. Davila
4, 5th Floor, San Jose

19
20

Before the Court is Plaintiff Kelly Brezoczky’s (“Kelly”) Administrative Motion pursuant to

21

Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5 regarding the filing under seal of Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of M.

22

Monica Ip (“Exhibits”), filed in support of her Opposition to Domtar Corporation’s Motion for

23

Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication.

24

The Administrative Motion states that the Exhibits contain and offer opinions regarding

25

materials which have been designated by Defendant Domtar Corporation (“Domtar”) as Confidential

26

pursuant to this Court’s Amended Stipulated Protective Order entered on May 4, 2017, (ECF Dkt No.

27

46), and that as a result, the Exhibits themselves have been designated Confidential pursuant to the

28

Amended Stipulated Protective Order.
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
EXHIBITS A AND B TO THE DECLARATION OF M. MONICA IP
Brezoczky v. Domtar Corp., et al., Case No. 5:16-CV-4995-EJD

1
2
3
4

Domtar [HAS / HAS NOT] filed within 4 days of the filing of the Administrative Motion an
opposition pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that the designated material is sealable.
[The Court has considered the opposition of Domtar pursuant to 79-5(d)(1)(A) and finds
that Domtar [HAS / HAS NOT] established that the Exhibits are sealable.]

5

After considering the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Administrative Motion is

6

[GRANTED / DENIED]. Plaintiff is directed to take all necessary action, if any, to file the Exhibits

7

with the Clerk of Court in conformance with this Order.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 5
_______________, 2017

________________________________________
Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Court Judge

Dated: November 1, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

LEONARDMEYER LLP

21
22
23

By: /s/ Derek J. Meyer
Derek J. Meyer
One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff

24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
EXHIBITS A AND B TO THE DECLARATION OF M. MONICA IP
Brezoczky v. Domtar Corp., et al., Case No. 5:16-CV-4995-EJD

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1
2

I, Derek J. Meyer, an attorney, hereby certify that the attached [PROPOSED] ORDER ON

3

PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS A AND B

4

TO THE DECLARATION OF M. MONICA IP was served via the CM/ECF filing system and

5

electronic mail on November 1, 2017, to all counsel of record.

6
7
8

Dated: November 1, 2017

By: /s/ Derek J. Meyer

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
EXHIBITS A AND B TO THE DECLARATION OF M. MONICA IP
Brezoczky v. Domtar Corp., et al., Case No. 5:16-CV-4995-EJD