Garcia v. McDowell
Filing
63
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE re 62 Notice (Other) filed by Esequiel Garcia. Traverse due by 9/22/2020.Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/24/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 5:16-cv-05301-BLF Document 63 Filed 07/24/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ESEQUIEL GARCIA,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
14
RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden,
Case No. 16-05301 BLF (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
TRAVERSE
Docket No. 62
Respondent.
15
16
17
Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 19, 2020, Respondent filed a response. Dkt. No.
19
56. Petitioner’s traverse is currently due no later than July 24, 2020. On July 17, 2020,
20
Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file the traverse, extending the
21
deadline to September 22, 2020, based on circumstances at the prison due to the
22
COVID-19 pandemic. Dkt. No. 62. Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED.
23
Petitioner shall file a traverse no later than September 22, 2020.
24
The matter will be deemed submitted on the date Petitioner’s traverse is due.
25
This order terminates Docket No. 62.
26
27
28
Case 5:16-cv-05301-BLF Document 63 Filed 07/24/20 Page 2 of 2
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: __July 24, 2020_____
________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting an Ext. of Time to File Traverse
P:\PRO-SE\BLF\HC.16\05301Garcia_eot-trav.docx
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?