Vasquez et al v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 28

PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY): The June 29, 2017 Trial Setting Conference is hereby vacated. The parties are to comply with the following schedule: Hearing on Anticipated Dispositive Motions: 9:00 a.m. on September 28, 2017. Final Pretrial Conference: 11 :00 a.m. on August 16, 2018. Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, Motions in Limine and Exchange of Exhibits: August 2, 2018. Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury Instructions, and Proposed Jury Verdict Forms: August 6, 2018. Jury Selection: 9:0 0 a.m. on August 28, 2018. Jury Trial: August 28-29, 2018; August 31, 2018; September 4-5, 2018; September 7, 2018; September 11-12, 2018; September 14, 2018; September 18-19, 2018; September 21, 2018. Jury Deliberations: September 24-28, 2018. All matters will be heard in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 6/28/2017. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 AURORA VASQUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY) COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Case No. 5:16-cv-05436-EJD The above-entitled action is scheduled for a Trial Setting Conference on June 29, 2017. 14 Based on the parties’ Joint Trial Setting Conference Statement(s), the court has determined an 15 appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Trial Setting Conference is VACATED 16 and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule. 17 Defendants’ request to extend the page limitation for their anticipated Motion for 18 Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendant’s motion shall not exceed 30 pages and, in turn, 19 Plaintiff’s response to the motion shall not exceed 30 pages. 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply to this case: 21 EVENT DATE 22 Hearing on Anticipated Dispositive Motions 9:00 a.m. on September 28, 2017 23 Final Pretrial Conference 11:00 a.m. on August 16, 2018 24 Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, Motions in Limine and Exchange of Exhibits August 2, 2018 26 Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury Instructions, and Proposed Jury Verdict Forms August 6, 2018 27 Jury Selection 9:00 a.m. on August 28, 2018 25 28 1 2 Jury Trial1 August 28-29, 2018; August 31, 2018; September 4-5, 2018; September 7, 2018; September 1112, 2018; September 14, 2018; September 18-19, 2018; September 21, 2018 Jury Deliberations September 24-28, 2018 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the Standing Order for 8 Civil Cases, a copy of which is available from the Clerk of the Court,2 with regard to all pretrial 9 submissions. 10 The court advises the parties that this is the final case schedule. All parties are expected United States District Court Northern District of California 11 to comply as directed above. This schedule will not be amended further absent the presentation of 12 good cause necessitating such an amendment. 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2017 16 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Jury trials will are held in full day sessions on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays, unless the Court specifies otherwise. On the date set for jury selection, counsel should be prepared to commence trial proceedings immediately after a jury is identified. The final trial schedule will be confirmed at the Final Pretrial Conference. 2 A copy of Judge Davila’s standing order is also available on the court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov by clicking first on the “Judges” button, then on Judge Davila’s name, then on the link for “Judge Davila’s Standing Orders,” and finally on the link for “Standing Order for Civil Cases.” 2 Case No.: 5:16-cv-05436-EJD PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?