Koghan v. United Legal Group, CCB

Filing 29

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL. Plaintiff to appear and show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Show Cause Hearing set for 6/13/2017 10:00 AM. Trinette Kent directed to serve this order on plaintiff and file a proof of service with the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/30/2017. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

STEVEN KOGHAN,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

Case No.5:16-cv-06130-HRL

v.
UNITED LEGAL GROUP, et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on October 24, 2016. Subsequently, this court issued an order

19

granting his counsel’s request to withdraw from this matter, subject to the condition that papers

20

could continue to be served on her for forwarding purposes, unless and until plaintiff appeared

21

through other counsel or pro se. (Dkt. 22). In that order, plaintiff was specifically advised that,

22

even if he is not represented by an attorney, he must (a) meet filing and other litigation deadlines,

23

(b) follow all court orders and applicable rules, and (c) make scheduled court appearances. He

24

was also told that the failure to do so may result in sanctions. (Id.).

25

Plaintiff has not made an appearance pro se. Nor has another attorney made an appearance

26

on his behalf. Plaintiff failed to submit a case management statement by the May 23, 2017

27

deadline, and he did not appear for the May 30, 2017 Initial Case Management Conference.

28

Accordingly, plaintiff Steven Koghan is directed to appear in person before this court on

1

June 13, 2017, 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, United States District Court, 280 South

2

First Street, San Jose, California and show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure

3

to prosecute.

4

Plaintiff’s former counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff and to file a

5

proof of service with the court. In an abundance of caution, the court will also mail a copy of this

6

order to the address associated with plaintiff it has found on the docket.

7
8

SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2017

9
10
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

5:16-cv-06130-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

2

Christopher Glenn Beckom

[e-mail]

3

Trinette Gragirena Kent [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail], [e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3