Optronic Technologies, Inc., v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 107

ORDER re 97 Joint Discovery Statement re Plaintiff's Request to Compel Production of Documents; Setting Hearing. Telephonic discovery hearing set for 6/11/2018, 9:30 AM. Counsel shall arrange for appearance via CourtCall. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 6/7/2018. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SAN JOSE DIVISION

7
8

OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC,
Plaintiff,

9
v.

10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No.16-cv-06370-EJD (VKD)

NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO.,
LTD., et al.,

12

Defendants.

ORDER RE JOINT DISCOVERY
STATEMENT RE PLAINTIFF'S
REQUEST TO COMPEL PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS; SETTING HEARING
Re: Dkt. No. 97

13
14

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Discovery Statement re Plaintiff’s Request to

15

Compel Production of Documents (Dkt. No. 97) and sets a telephonic hearing on the matter for

16

June 11, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel shall arrange for appearance via CourtCall Phone

17

Conferencing at [phone]. If any party cannot appear at the scheduled time, they should

18

confer regarding a mutually agreeable date and time during the week of June 11, and then contact

19

Judge DeMarchi’s Courtroom Deputy, Patricia Cromwell, at [phone] to schedule a

20

different date or time for the hearing.

21

At the hearing, the parties should be prepared to discuss the following issues:

22

1.

Which party or parties did Sheppard Mullin represent in the Meade transaction?

23

2.

Are the documents plaintiff is seeking from Sheppard Mullin documents that

24

plaintiff contends are within the possession, custody or control of a defendant or defendants on

25

whom plaintiff has already served discovery requests?

26

3.

Which specific discovery requests does plaintiff contend require a defendant or

27

defendants to gather and produce documents that are in Sheppard Mullin’s physical possession (or

28

that plaintiff believes are in Sheppard Mullin’s physical possession)?

1

4.

What documents or information does plaintiff expect to discover from Sheppard

2

Mullin that it has not been able to discover already from discovery of defendants, and how does

3

that information bear on a claim or defense in the action?

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 7, 2018

6
7
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
United States Magistrate Judge

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2