Optronic Technologies, Inc., v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
655
ORDER GRANTING MOTION 589 BY SHEPPARD MULLIN TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., LTD. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/8/2020. (ejdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2020)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO.,
LTD., et al.,
12
Case No. 5:16-cv-06370-EJD
ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY
SHEPPARD MULLIN TO WITHDRAW
AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO.,
LTD.
Defendants.
13
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5(a), Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
14
(“Sheppard Mullin”) moves to withdraw from its representation of defendant Ningbo Sunny
15
Electronic Co., Ltd. (“Ningbo Sunny”) in this case. Dkt. No. 589. Plaintiff Optronic
16
Technologies, Inc. (“Orion”) opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 607. The motion was heard on May 8,
17
2020. Having considered the parties’ briefs and arguments at the hearing, the Court GRANTS
18
Sheppard Mullin’s motion to withdraw as counsel.
19
The Court finds that Sheppard Mullin has shown good cause to withdraw pursuant to
20
California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.16(b).1 Sheppard Mullin offered evidence
21
demonstrating that (1) Ningbo Sunny has “breache[d] a material term of an agreement” with
22
23
24
25
26
1
In this district, the conduct of counsel, including the withdrawal of counsel, is governed by
the standards of professional conduct required of members of the State Bar of California. N.D.
Cal. Civ. L.R. 11-4(1); Kannan v. Apple Inc., No. 5:17-CV-07305-EJD, 2020 WL 75942, at *1
(N.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2020).
27
28
CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-06370-EJD
ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY SHEPPARD MULLIN TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
1
1
Sheppard Mullin by failing to pay Sheppard Mullin’s legal fees; and (2) Ningbo Sunny has
2
“render[ed] it unreasonably difficult for [Sheppard Mullin] to carry out the representation
3
effectively” by refusing to communicate with Sheppard Mullin directly and ignoring Sheppard
4
Mullin’s advice. Cal. Rules of Professional Conduct 1.16(b)(4)-(5). The Court finds that both of
5
these reasons warrant withdrawal. See Frazier v. Am. Credit Resolution, Inc., No. 18-CV-07729-
6
TSH, 2019 WL 3554505, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2019) (“Failure to pay attorney’s fees provides
7
a sufficient basis on which to grant a request to withdraw.”); Soles v. United Airlines, Inc., No. 16-
8
CV-08769 BRO (EX), 2017 WL 10562538, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2017) (“Failure to
9
communicate with counsel constitutes good cause for an attorney to seek withdrawal.”).
10
The Court further finds that withdrawal will result in minimal prejudice to Orion given
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
that, with a few exceptions, all post-judgment motions have been resolved. The Court
12
acknowledges the motion for sanctions currently pending before Judge DeMarchi. Dkt. No. 624.
13
In order to prevent any additional burden on the Court or prejudice to Orion, the Court will require
14
Sheppard Mullin to continue representing Ningbo Sunny for 30 days or until that motion is
15
resolved, whichever is sooner.
16
For the reasons stated above and at the hearing on May 8, 2020, IT IS HEREBY
17
ORDERED that the motion to withdraw is GRANTED on the condition that Sheppard Mullin will
18
continue to represent Ningbo Sunny until such time as the sanctions motion pending before Judge
19
DeMarchi is resolved, or 30 days from the date of this order, whichever is sooner. Sheppard
20
Mullin is otherwise relieved of all obligations as counsel in this case, including with respect to
21
other motions currently pending or motions filed after the date of this order.
22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sheppard Mullin will continue to serve on Ningbo
23
Sunny all papers filed in this action and forward communication from Plaintiff counsel until
24
substitute counsel has entered an appearance.
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ningbo Sunny will provide a status report, in writing,
26
no later than May 22, 2020, updating the Court on its search for new counsel. A status conference
27
will be set for June 11, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.
28
CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-06370-EJD
ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY SHEPPARD MULLIN TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
2
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 8, 2020
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-06370-EJD
ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY SHEPPARD MULLIN TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?