Che v. Cupertino Village, LP et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 DISMISSING CASE. Case dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/24/2017. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2017)

1
2
3
4

ASCENSION LAW GROUP
PAMELA TSAO( 266734)
17802 Irvine Blvd
Suite A117
Tustin, CA 92780
PH: 714.783.4220
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
Attorneys for Plaintiff NGOC LAM CHE
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

NGOC LAM CHE, an individual

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
CUPERTINO VILLAGE, LP, limited
partnership;

15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:16-cv-06550-HRL
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION
OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
[Hon. Howard R. Lloyd presiding]
Re: Dkt. 25

24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
5:16-CV-06550-HRL

1
Pursuant to the parties’ “Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice,” and good cause
2
appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant shall be dismissed with
3
prejudice in the above-captioned action. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorney’s
4
fees. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement terms between the parties.
5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED
August 24, 2017
Dated ______________________

________________________________
Hon. Howard R. Lloyd
Magistrate Judge, United States District Court,
Northern District of California

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
5:16-CV-06550-HRL