Perez v. Target Corporation
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Re: Dkt. No. 28 . By 12/12/2017, Perez must file a response to this order indicating intent to prosecute the case. Plaintiff's counsel must serve this order on the plaintiff and file proof of service, also by 12/12. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 12/5/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 16-cv-06638-NC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. No. 28
Plaintiff Deysi Perez has stopped prosecuting this case. Following several
continuances of mediation and case management deadlines, the Court held a case
management conference on November 15, 2017. Perez’s counsel did not attend, did not
answer the Court’s efforts to reach him telephonically, did not file a case management
statement before the conference, and did not request a continuance. The Court then
ordered Perez to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute,
and why plaintiff’s counsel should not be sanctioned. Dkt. No. 28. The response to that
order was due on November 23, 2017, and no response has been filed.
This order to show cause is Perez’s final warning. By December 12, 2017, Perez
must file a response to this order indicating intent to prosecute the case. Plaintiff’s counsel
must serve this order on the plaintiff and file proof of service, also by December 12.
Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 5, 2017
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?