Perez v. Target Corporation

Filing 29

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Re: Dkt. No. 28 . By 12/12/2017, Perez must file a response to this order indicating intent to prosecute the case. Plaintiff's counsel must serve this order on the plaintiff and file proof of service, also by 12/12. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 12/5/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DEYSI PEREZ,
Plaintiff,

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Case No. 16-cv-06638-NC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 28
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant.

13
14

Plaintiff Deysi Perez has stopped prosecuting this case. Following several

15

continuances of mediation and case management deadlines, the Court held a case

16

management conference on November 15, 2017. Perez’s counsel did not attend, did not

17

answer the Court’s efforts to reach him telephonically, did not file a case management

18

statement before the conference, and did not request a continuance. The Court then

19

ordered Perez to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute,

20

and why plaintiff’s counsel should not be sanctioned. Dkt. No. 28. The response to that

21

order was due on November 23, 2017, and no response has been filed.

22

This order to show cause is Perez’s final warning. By December 12, 2017, Perez

23

must file a response to this order indicating intent to prosecute the case. Plaintiff’s counsel

24

must serve this order on the plaintiff and file proof of service, also by December 12.

25

Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 5, 2017

_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge