Alejandro Picazo v. Randstad US, LP et al

Filing 93

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 78 defendant's Motion for Sanctions. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 ALEJANDRO PICAZO, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Case No.5:16-cv-06644-HRL ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS v. RANDSTAD US, LP, Re: Dkt. No. 78 Defendant. 17 18 Upon review of the papers, as well as the discussion held at the December 19, 2017 status 19 conference, the court concludes that, under the circumstances presented, the imposition of 20 sanctions would not serve the interests of justice. Defendant’s motion therefore is denied. 21 22 SO ORDERED. Dated: January 16, 2018 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?