Alejandro Picazo v. Randstad US, LP et al

Filing 93

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 78 defendant's Motion for Sanctions. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

ALEJANDRO PICAZO,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

Case No.5:16-cv-06644-HRL
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

v.
RANDSTAD US, LP,

Re: Dkt. No. 78

Defendant.

17
18

Upon review of the papers, as well as the discussion held at the December 19, 2017 status

19

conference, the court concludes that, under the circumstances presented, the imposition of

20

sanctions would not serve the interests of justice. Defendant’s motion therefore is denied.

21
22

SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 16, 2018

23
24
25
26
27
28

HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge