Fresh & Best Produce, Inc. v. Oaktown Ventures, LLC et al

Filing 16

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Re: Dkt. No. 14 . Fresh & Best to file a brief not to exceed 10 pages addressing each of the Eitel factors by 4/7/2017. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 3/30/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FRESH & BEST PRODUCE, INC., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 OAKTOWN VENTURES, LLC, et al., 14 Defendants. Case No. 16-cv-06991 NC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff Fresh & Best Produce, Inc. filed a motion for default judgment against 18 defendants Oaktown Ventures, LLC and Richard Hackett. Dkt. No. 14. In its motion, 19 Fresh & Best did not address the factors set forth by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. McCool to 20 assist the Court in determining whether default judgment is warranted. 782 F.2d 1470, 21 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986). 22 Those factors are: (1) the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff; (2) the merits of 23 the plaintiff’s substantive claim; (3) the sufficiency of the complaint; (4) the sum of money 24 at stake in the action; (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material facts; (6) whether 25 the default was due to excusable neglect; and (7) the strong policy favoring decisions on 26 the merits. Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471-72. 27 28 Thus, the Court ORDERS Fresh & Best to file with the Court a brief not to exceed 10 pages addressing each of the seven Eitel factors by April 7, 2017. Case No. 16-cv-06991 NC 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: March 30, 2017 4 _____________________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 16-cv-06991 NC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?