Stribling v. Baughman
Filing
6
ORDER OF TRANSFER. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/2/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
AARON STRIBLING,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Petitioner,
12
Case No. 16-07176 EJD (PR)
ORDER OF TRANSFER
v.
13
14
DAVID BAUGHMAN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner currently confined at California State Prison –
19
Sacramento, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254,
20
challenging his state conviction.1 Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district
21
of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Here, Petitioner is
22
challenging his conviction out of Sacramento County, (Pet. at 3), which lies within the
23
venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). Therefore, venue
24
properly lies in that district and not in this one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Accordingly,
25
this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
26
California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
27
1
28
The matter was reassigned to this Court on January 25, 2017, after Petitioner did not file
notice of consent to magistrate jurisdiction. (Docket No. 5.)
1
The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the
2
Eastern District of California.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
2/2/2017
Dated: _____________________
________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Order of Transfer
PRO-SE\EJD\HC.16\07176Stribling_transfer(ED)
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?