Apple Inc. v. Acacia Research Corporation et al

Filing 127

ORDER GRANTING 126 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/28/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MARK D. SELWYN, State Bar No. 244180
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Apple Inc.

13

JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155
MAURA L. REES, State Bar No. 191698
RYAN R. SMITH, State Bar No. 229323
JAMIE Y. OTTO, State Bar No. 295099
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

14

Attorneys for Defendant VoiceAge Corporation

7
8
9
10
11
12

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN JOSE DIVISION

18
19

APPLE INC.,
Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23
24
25

Case No. 5:16-CV-7266-EJD

vs.
ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION,
SAINT LAWRENCE COMMUNICATIONS,
LLC, SAINT LAWRENCE
COMMUNICATIONS GMBH, AND
VOICEAGE CORPORATION,
Defendants.

Assigned to Hon. Edward J. Davila
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANT VOICEAGE
CORPORATION TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO APPLE
INC.’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-7266

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

1
2

1.

Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Defendant VoiceAge Corporation (“VoiceAge”),

3

jointly stipulate, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), to extend the time for VoiceAge to answer or

4

otherwise respond to Apple’s Second Amended Complaint by 30 days to December 7, 2017.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

2.

VoiceAge requests this extension of time by 30 days in which to respond the

Second Amended Complaint to allow for more time to prepare its response.
3.

Apple filed the Second Amended Complaint on October 11, 2017, adding

VoiceAge as a defendant. (D.I. 115.)
4.

There have been no other extensions of time relating to VoiceAge, whether by

order or stipulation.
5.

The proposed date of December 7, 2017 for VoiceAge to respond to the Second

12

Amended Complaint occurs more than two months prior to the February 22, 2018 hearing for oral

13

arguments regarding the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Acacia Research Corporation,

14

Cellular Communications Equipment GMBH, Cellular Communications Equipment LLC, Saint

15

Lawrence Communications GMBH, Saint Lawrence Communications LLC.

16

6.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned counsel that, subject to the

17

Court's approval, the time for VoiceAge to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the

18

Second Amended Complaint in the above-entitled action is extended up to and including

19

December 7, 2017. By entering this stipulation, no party is waiving any argument, right or

20

defense.

21
22

Dated: November 27, 2017

23
24

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
DORR LLP

25

By: /s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn

26

Attorneys for Plaintiff Apple Inc.

27
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-7266-EJD

1

Dated: November 27, 2017

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation

2
3

By: /s/ James C. Yoon
James C. Yoon

4
5

Attorneys for Defendant VoiceAge Corporation

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the content of this document is
acceptable to all persons whose signatures are indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this
e-filed document.

Dated: November 27, 2017

14

/s/ James C. Yoon
James C. Yoon

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-7266-EJD

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT:
Defendant VoiceAge Corporation’s time to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond
is extended up to and including December 7, 2017.

5
6

28
November ____, 2017

_____________________________________
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-7266-EJD