De Vallejo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiff does not, by 7/3/2017, demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The motion hearing scheduled for 6/29/2017 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/26/2017. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2017)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
5
ROSA VEGA DE VALLEJO,
Case No. 5:16-cv-07351-EJD
Plaintiff,
6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
7
8
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
9
10
On January 3, 2017, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed a motion to dismiss to which
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Plaintiff’s response was due by January 17, 2017. Dkt. No. 7. As of the date and time this order
12
was filed, however, the court has not received a response to the motion.
13
Accordingly, the court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be
14
dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff does not, by July 3, 2017, demonstrate good cause
15
in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice
16
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff should note that, under these
17
circumstances, the court will not find cause sufficient to discharge this order unless her response is
18
accompanied by an opposition to the motion to dismiss.
19
20
No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court.
The motion hearing scheduled for June 29, 2017, is VACATED.
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 26, 2017
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:16-cv-07351-EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?