Mobile Telecommunications Technologies v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 21

ORDER AS MODIFIED GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING 20 . Mobile Telecommunications Technologies' Motion to Compel 1 is continued to 3/30/2016 01:00 PM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/10/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

David J. Miclean (SBN 115098)
[e-mail]
Carmen M. Aviles (SBN 251993)
[e-mail]
MICLEAN GLEASON LLP
411 Borel Avenue, Suite 310
San Mateo, CA 94402
Office: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Craig S. Jepson (SBN 132150)
REED & SCARDINO LLP
301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1250
Austin, TX 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

11
12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18

MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES,

19

Plaintiff,

20

v.

21

24

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.,

25

Case No.:

5:16-mc-80012-NC

JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST
TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOBILE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES’ MOTION TO
COMPEL AND ORDER AS MODIFIED

Defendants.

22
23

[L.R. CIV. 7-7]

26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

5:16-MC-80012-NC

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC (“MTel”) filed a

2

Motion to Compel Third-Party Google, Inc. to Produce Documents and to Make Available an

3

Additional Witness and Request for Sanctions Pursuant to FRCP 37 (hereinafter, “Motion”) on

4

January 14, 2016 (Dkt. No. 1).

5

WHEREAS, hearing on the Motion was set by the Court for February 10, 2016 (Dkt. 9).

6

WHEREAS, third-party Google, Inc. (“Google) filed an Opposition to the Motion on

7

January 28, 2016 (Dkt. No. 28).

8
9

WHEREAS, MTel filed its Reply to Google’s Opposition on February 4, 2016 (Dkt. No.
18).

10

WHEREAS, all briefing on MTel’s Motion is complete. The Parties have since

11

conferred on resolving the dispute through a mutually agreeable understanding. In view of the

12

potential resolution of the dispute, the Parties request a continuance of the hearing.

13

WHEREAS, this is the Parties’ first request to continue the hearing.

14

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties request the Court continue the hearing to March 16,

15

2016, or any other time thereafter that is convenient for the Court.

16
17
18

Dated: February 10, 2016

Respectfully submitted,
MICLEAN GLEASON LLP

19
By /s/ Carmen M. Aviles
David J. Miclean
Carmen M. Aviles
Attorneys for Plaintiff Mobile
Telecommunications Technologies, LLC

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

5:16-MC-80012-NC

1
2

Dated: February 10, 2016

3
4

Respectfully submitted,
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
By /s/ Andrea Pallios Roberts
Andrea Pallios Roberts
Attorneys for Third-Party Google Inc.

5
6
7

MODIFIED ORDER

8
9

The hearing on Plaintiff Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC’s Motion to
Compel is continued to March 30, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose.

10

13
14
15

DERED
SO OR
IT IS
DIFIED
A S MO

NO

16

RT

ER

M. Cousin

H

17

thanael
Judge Na

18

s

LI

UNIT
ED

S

RT
U
O

12

IST

RIC
SD
___________________________________
TC
TE
A NATHANAEL COUSINS
HONORABLE
T
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

R NIA

February 10, 2016

FO

Dated:

A

11

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

5:16-MC-80012-NC