Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Filing 185

ORDER by Judge Susan van Keulen denying 174 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (svklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FINJAN, INC., Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 CISCO SYSTEMS INC., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Defendant. Before the Court is Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT OF DISCOVERY DISPUTE UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 174 12 14 Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF (SVK) ECF 174. The motion seeks to seal limited portions of the parties’ Joint Statement of Discovery Dispute (ECF 175). Finjan seeks to seal these materials on the grounds that they quote from documents that Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) has designated as “Highly Confidential —Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Protective Order in this case. However, Cisco has informed the Court that as the designating party, Cisco has reviewed the items lodged conditionally under seal and does not believe that they discuss confidential information with sufficient specificity to warrant exclusion from the public record. ECF 181. There is therefore no basis upon which to seal portions of the Joint Statement of Discovery Dispute. Finjan’s administrative motion to seal is therefore DENIED. Plaintiff shall file the unredacted version of these materials in the public record in accordance with Civil Local Rule 795(e)(2). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 19, 2019 26 27 28 SUSAN VAN KEULEN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?