Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Filing 622

ORDER on 621 Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Request to Redact Transcript of Proceedings Held on April 21, 2020. Stipulation or noticed motion due by May 18, 2020. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 5/14/2020. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2020)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FINJAN, INC., Plaintiff, 8 9 v. CISCO SYSTEMS INC., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Defendant. Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF (SVK) ORDER ON DEFENDANT CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S REQUEST TO REDACT TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS HELD ON APRIL 21, 2020 Re: Dkt. No. 621 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.’s Request to Redact Transcript of 14 Proceedings Held on April 21, 2020. Dkt. 621. In this District, the electronic availability of 15 transcripts of court proceedings is governed by General Order 59, which provides that “[i]f a party 16 wants [non-personal identifying] information redacted from the transcript, that party must move 17 18 19 the Court for further redaction by noticed motion served on all parties and the court reporter.” General Order 59 at ¶ 4 (emphasis added). To avoid unnecessary motion practice, the Court directs the parties to meet and confer and, no later than May 18, 2020, file a proposed stipulation regarding redactions to the transcript of 20 April 21, 2020 proceedings. If the parties are unable to agree, Cisco may re-file its redaction 21 22 23 request as a noticed motion in accordance with General Order 59 by the same deadline, SO ORDERED. Dated: May 14, 2020 24 25 26 27 28 SUSAN VAN KEULEN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?