Che v. San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Foundation et al
Filing
78
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/27/2018. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2018)
1
2
3
4
ASCENSION LAW GROUP
PAMELA TSAO (SBN: 266734)
17802 Irvine Blvd Suite 117
Tustin, CA 92780
PH: 714.783.4220
FAX: 888.505.1033
Pamela.Tsao@ascensionlawgroup.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff NGOC LAM CHE
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NGOC LAM CHE, an individual
Case No.: 5:17-cv-00381
12
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
13
vs.
14
15
16
17
SAN JOSE/EVERGREEN COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION, a
California Corporation; IMWALLE
PROPERTIES, INC, a California Corporation,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-00381
1
PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
2
Pursuant to a settlement agreement reached by the parties, see ECF 56, Plaintiff Ngoc Lam
3
4
Che (“Plaintiff”) is the prevailing party and is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. On
August 16, 2018, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees
5
and Costs against Defendants San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Foundation, a
6
California Corporation, and Imwalle Properties, Inc., a California Corporation (collectively
7
“Defendants”), and awarded Plaintiff $32,237.50 in attorney’s fees.
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:
9
1.
Defendants are ordered to pay Plaintiff $32,237.50 in attorneys’ fees.
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS FURTHER ORDRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Court will retain
jurisdiction to ensure compliance with this judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the action be, and it hereby
is, dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated: August 27, 2018
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-00381
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?