Indiveri v. Mack
Filing
54
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO OPPOSE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Granting 53 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/13/2018: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN A. INDIVERI,
Case No. C 17-00595-BLF
12
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CHANGE
TIME TO OPPOSE PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
13
v.
14
15
16
RICHARD MACK, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Defendants Dunlap, Gamboa, Hanter, Kumar, and Mack (Defendants) move this Court to
20
change the deadline to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s summary-judgment motion to November 8,
be
2018. Defendants also request that they permitted to file a combination opposition to Plaintiff’s
21
summary-judgment motion and cross summary-judgment motion. After full consideration, and
22
good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. Plaintiff must file and serve a
23
reply and opposition to Defendants’ motion no later than twenty-eight days from the date
24
Defendants’ motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen days after
25
Plaintiff’s opposition is filed. Absent further order, the motion will be deemed submitted as of
26
the date Defendants’ reply brief is due without a hearing.
27
9/11/2018
Dated: __________________________
19
28
_________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
1
[Proposed] Order (C 17-00595-BLF)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?