McCurdy v. Rivero, et al

Filing 157

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. 156 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JAMES MCCURDY, 9 10 Plaintiff, Case No. 17-01043 BLF (PR) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT v. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 M. RIVERO, et al., Defendants. (Docket No. 156) 14 15 16 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 17 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at various institutions, including Defendant Dr. 18 B. Deal at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). On September 10, 2019, the Court granted 19 Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 20 deliberate indifference claim; judgment was entered the following day. (Docket Nos. 145, 21 146.) On October 31, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend 22 judgment. (Docket No. 154.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to an extension of time to 23 file a reply to Defendant’s opposition to his motion is DENIED as moot. (Docket No. 24 156.) This order terminates Docket No. 156. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: _November 20, 2019_ 27 28 Order Denying Motion as Moot PRO-SE\BLF\CR.17\01043McCurdy_moot ________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?