McCurdy v. Rivero, et al
Filing
157
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. 156 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
JAMES MCCURDY,
9
10
Plaintiff,
Case No. 17-01043 BLF (PR)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT
v.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
M. RIVERO, et al.,
Defendants.
(Docket No. 156)
14
15
16
Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to
17
42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at various institutions, including Defendant Dr.
18
B. Deal at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). On September 10, 2019, the Court granted
19
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment
20
deliberate indifference claim; judgment was entered the following day. (Docket Nos. 145,
21
146.) On October 31, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend
22
judgment. (Docket No. 154.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to an extension of time to
23
file a reply to Defendant’s opposition to his motion is DENIED as moot. (Docket No.
24
156.) This order terminates Docket No. 156.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: _November 20, 2019_
27
28
Order Denying Motion as Moot
PRO-SE\BLF\CR.17\01043McCurdy_moot
________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?