Cristela Maxson v. Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. All deadlines/hearings are terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/26/2017. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2017)

Case 5:17-cv-01293-EJD Document 22 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 2

5
6

8

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
VED
APPRO

9

vila

RT

A

H

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA E R 10/26/2017 C
N
OF

11

D IS T IC T
R

12
13

CRISTELA MAXSON,

14

Plaintiff,

15

rd J. D a

LI

NO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

dwa
Judge E

RT
U
O

7

Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
(erroneously sued herein as SANTA CLARA
COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE); RICHARD M.
ALANIS; DANIEL RODRIGUEZ; KEN BINDER;
CARL NEUSEL; AND LAURIE SMITH

Attorney for Plaintiff
CRISTELA MAXSON

R NIA

4

FO

3

M. GREG MULLANAX, (S.B. #155138)
[e-mail]
Law Office of M. Greg Mullanax
2141N. Winery Avenue, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93703
Telephone No.: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

S

2

JAMES R. WILLIAMS (S.B. #271253)
County Counsel
MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN (S.B. #133203)
Deputy County Counsel
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor
San Jose, California 95110-1770
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

UNIT
ED

1

No. 5:17-CV-01293-EJD (NC)
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

v.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
OFFICE; RICHARD M. ALANIS; DANIEL
17 RODRIGUEZ; KEN BINDER; CARL NEUSEL;
LAURIE SMITH, Sheriff of Santa Clara County;
18 and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
16

Defendants.

19
20
21

Plaintiff, Cristela Maxson and defendants, Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office, Richard M.

22

Alanis, Daniel Rodriguez, Ken Binder, Carl Neusel, and Laurie Smith, Sheriff of Santa Clara

23

County, file this Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

24

41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

25

1.

On March 10, 2017, plaintiff sued defendants.

26

2.

Defendants agree to the dismissal.

27

3.

This case is not a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, a derivative

28

action under FRCP 23.1, or an action related to an unincorporated association under FCRP 23.2.
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice

1

5:17-CV-01293-EJD (NC)

Case 5:17-cv-01293-EJD Document 22 Filed 10/26/17 Page 2 of 2

1

4.

A receiver has not been appointed in this case.

2

5.

This case is not governed by any federal statute that requires a court order for

3

dismissal of the case.
6.

4
5

Plaintiff has not previously dismissed any federal or state court suit based on or

including the same claims as those presented in this case.

6

7.

7

I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures

8

indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

9
10

This dismissal is with prejudice.

Dated: October 26, 2017

Respectfully submitted,
JAMES R. WILLIAMS
County Counsel

11
12

By:

13

/s/
MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN
Deputy County Counsel

14
15

Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
(ERRONEOUSLY SUED HEREIN AS
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
OFFICE); RICHARD M. ALANIS; DANIEL
RODRIGUEZ; KEN BINDER; CARL
NEUSEL; AND LAURIE SMITH

16
17
18
19

Dated: October 26, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

20

By:

21

/s/
M. GREG MULLANAX

22

Attorney for Plaintiff
CRISTELA MAXSON

23
24
25
26
27

1639551

28

Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice

2

5:17-CV-01293-EJD (NC)