Sapp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING 5 , 7 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND 14 MOTION TO AMEND CAPTION OF THE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/29/2017.(blflc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2017)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
6
SHAMONT L. SAPP,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
10
Case No. 17-cv-01698-BLF
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND
MOTION TO AMEND CAPTION OF
THE COMPLAINT
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Before the Court is Plaintiff Shamont Sapp’s application to proceed in forma pauperis.
13
ECF 5. Having considered the application and the complaint, the Court hereby GRANTS Sapp’s
14
application. Sapp also moves to amend the caption of this case. ECF 14. The caption of the
15
initial complaint indicates that the case was filed based on the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
16
ECF 1. However, Sapp requests that the “42 U.S.C. § 1983” caption be replaced with “California
17
Consumer Protection Act” and “Oregon Consumer Protection Act.” ECF 14-1. The Court finds
18
this amendment proper and thus GRANTS the motion to amend the caption of the complaint.
19
The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons. It is further ordered that the U.S. Marshal for
20
the Northern District of California serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any
21
amendment, including the exhibit at ECF 14-1, scheduling orders, attachments, and this order
22
upon the defendant.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 29, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?