Sanchez v. American Para Professional Systems Inc et al

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING 24 MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/21/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Larry W. Lee (State Bar No. 228175) Nick Rosenthal (State Bar No. 268297) DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, P.C. 515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1250 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 488-6555 (213) 488-6554 facsimile WILLIAM L. MARDER, ESQ. (CBN 170131) Polaris Law Group LLP 501 San Benito Street, Suite 200 Hollister, CA 95023 Tel: (831) 531-4214 Fax: (831) 634-0333 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 SHANNON SANCHEZ, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 16 17 Plaintiffs, Case No.: 5:17-cv-01835-EJD [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT MOTION TO REMAND CASE HEARING vs. 18 21 AMERICAN PARA PROFESSIONAL SYSTEMS, INC., a New York corporation; A.P.P.S OF CALIFORNIA, business entity form unknown; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 22 Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: August 24, 2017 9:00 a.m. 4, 5th Floor Hon. Edward J. Davila Defendants. 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT MOTION TO REMAND CASE HEARING 1 Based on the request to appear telephonically submitted by Counsel for Plaintiff, 2 Larry W. Lee and Nick Rosenthal of Diversity Law Group may appear on behalf of Plaintiff 3 telephonically at the Motion to Remand Case hearing set for August 24, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 August 21, 2017 DATED: ______________________ ____________________________________ HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT MOTION TO REMAND CASE HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?