Sanchez v. American Para Professional Systems Inc et al
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING 24 MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/21/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Larry W. Lee (State Bar No. 228175)
Nick Rosenthal (State Bar No. 268297)
DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, P.C.
515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1250
Los Angeles, CA 90071
(213) 488-6555
(213) 488-6554 facsimile
WILLIAM L. MARDER, ESQ. (CBN 170131)
Polaris Law Group LLP
501 San Benito Street, Suite 200
Hollister, CA 95023
Tel: (831) 531-4214
Fax: (831) 634-0333
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
SHANNON SANCHEZ, as an individual
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
16
17
Plaintiffs,
Case No.: 5:17-cv-01835-EJD
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO
APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT MOTION TO
REMAND CASE HEARING
vs.
18
21
AMERICAN PARA PROFESSIONAL
SYSTEMS, INC., a New York
corporation; A.P.P.S OF CALIFORNIA,
business entity form unknown; and DOES
1 through 50, inclusive,
22
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
August 24, 2017
9:00 a.m.
4, 5th Floor
Hon. Edward J. Davila
Defendants.
19
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT
MOTION TO REMAND CASE HEARING
1
Based on the request to appear telephonically submitted by Counsel for Plaintiff,
2
Larry W. Lee and Nick Rosenthal of Diversity Law Group may appear on behalf of Plaintiff
3
telephonically at the Motion to Remand Case hearing set for August 24, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
August 21, 2017
DATED: ______________________
____________________________________
HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT
MOTION TO REMAND CASE HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?