Connelly v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER GRANTING 31 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/5/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JOSEPH W. COTCHETT
(SBN 36324; [e-mail])
NANCI E. NISHIMURA
(SBN 152621; [e-mail])
CAMILO ARTIGA-PURCELL
(SBN 273229; [e-mail])
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
San Francisco Airport Office Center
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, CA 94010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13
14

RICHARD CONNELLY,
Plaintiff,

15

v.

16
17
18
19
20

Case No. 5:17-cv-02006-EJD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR
OPPOSITION AND REPLY ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC., a Minnesota
corporation; ABBOTT LABORATORIES
AS THE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC., an Illinois
corporation; and PACESETTER, INC.,
dba St. Jude Cardiac Rhythm
Management Division, a Delaware
corporation,

21
22
23

Defendants.
Complaint Filed: April 11, 2017

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION AND
REPLY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; Case No. 5:17-cv-02006

1
2
3

WHEREAS, on April 11, 2017, Plaintiff Richard Connelly (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint
in the above-captioned matter;
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2017, Defendants St. Jude Medical, Inc., Abbott Laboratories,

4

and Pacesetter, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss all claims in

5

Plaintiff’s Complaint, set for hearing on August 17, 2017;

6
7
8
9

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Opposition papers are currently due on July 7, 2017, with
Defendants’ Reply papers currently due on July 14, 2017; and
WHEREAS, given the July 4, 2017 national holiday, Plaintiff and Defendants agree a
continuance of the deadlines to file Opposition and Reply papers, respectively, is warranted.

10

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:

11

1. Plaintiff’s Opposition papers to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss are due on July 14,

12
13
14
15
16

2017.
2. Defendants’ Reply papers in support of their Motion to Dismiss are due on July 28,
2017.
3. Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall proceed as calendared on August 17,
2017.

17
18

Dated: June 26, 2017

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP

19

By:

20
21

/s/ Camilo Artiga-Purcell
CAMILO ARTIGA-PURCELL
Attorneys for Plaintiff

22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: June 26, 2017

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
By:

/s/ Daniel L. Ring
DANIEL L. RING
Attorneys for Defendants

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION AND
REPLY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; Case No. 5:17-cv-02006

1

ATTESTATION OF FILING
2

I, Camilo Artiga-Purcell, hereby attest, pursuant to Northern District of Cali fornia, Local

3

Rule 5-1 (i)(3), that concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each

4

signatory hereto.

5
6
7
8

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND !PROPOSED! ORDER EXTENDI NG D EADLINES FOR OPPOSITION AND
REPLY ON D EFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; Case No. 5: 17-cv-02006

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

The above STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES

2
3

FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS is approved

4

and all parties shall comply with its provisions as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s Opposition papers to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss are due on July 14,

5

2017.

6

2. Defendants’ Reply papers in support of their Motion to Dismiss are due on July 28,

7

2017.

8

3. Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall proceed as calendared on August 17,

9

2017.

10
11

[In addition, the Court makes the further orders stated below:]

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED

14
15

Dated:

July 5, 2017
HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION AND
REPLY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; Case No. 5:17-cv-02006

3