Vomacka v. Cappello et al
Filing
32
ORDER Re Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice ECF 31 . CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. All deadlines/hearings are terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/7/2018. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Irene Karbelashvili, State Bar Number 232223
AllAcess Law Group
19 North Second Street, Suite 205
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 295-0137
Fax: (408) 295-0142
Kenneth J. Pinto, State Bar Number 221422
Law Office of Kenneth J. Pinto
12 South First Street, Suite 713
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 289-1765
Fax: (408) 289-1754
Attorneys for JASON VOMACKA, Plaintiff
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
JASON VOMACKA,
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ROMOLO CAPPELLO and ANGELA
CAPPELLO, collectively in their individual
and representative capacities as trustees of
the CAPPELLO FAMILY TRUST;
RAYMOND WANG, an individual, d/b/a
SLIDERS BURGERS; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:17-CV-02620-EJD
Civil Rights
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND
(PROPOSED) ORDER
[F.R.C.P.§§ 41(a)(1)(ii)]
22
FACTS
23
24
Plaintiff JASON VOMACKA and Defendants ROMOLO CAPPELLO and ANGELA
25
CAPPELLO, collectively in their individual and representative capacities as trustees of the
26
CAPPELLO FAMILY TRUST; RAYMOND WANG, an individual, d/b/a SLIDERS
27
BURGERS, by and through their attorneys of record or other representative, file this Stipulation
28
and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure §§
Case No. 5:17-CV-02620-EJD
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
[F.R.C.P.§§ 41(a)(1)(ii)]
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
41(a)(1)(ii)(2). Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on May 05, 2017. Defendants, some of whom have
answered the first amended complaint, agree to the dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiff and
Defendants further stipulate that each party shall pay its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
Defendants have agreed to remedy all known ADA violations identified in EXHIBIT A of
the settlement agreement executed by the parties.
6
This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed.
7
Wherefore, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their attorneys of record and/or
8
9
10
authorized representative, so stipulate.
DATED: June 06, 2018
By:/s/ Kenneth J. Pinto
___
___
KENNETH J. PINTO
Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD JOHNSON
DATED: June 06, 2018
BY:/s/ Sarahann Shapiro__________________
SARAHANN SHAPIRO
Attorney for Defendant ROMOLO CAPPELLO and
ANGELA CAPPELLO, collectively in their individual and
representative capacities as trustees of the CAPPELLO
FAMILY TRUST
DATED: June 06, 2018
BY:/s/ RICHARD SCHRAMM________________
RICHARD SCRAMM
Attorney for Defendant ; RAYMOND WANG dba
SLIDERS BURGER
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:17-CV-02620-EJD
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
[F.R.C.P.§§ 41(a)(1)(ii)]
Page 2 of 3
FILER’S ATTESTATION
1
2
3
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that on June 06, 2018, I, Kenneth J. Pinto,
received the concurrence of Sarahann Shapiro, Esq. in the filing of this document.
4
5
6
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that on June 06, 2018, I, Kenneth J. Pinto,
received the concurrence of Richard Schramm, Esq. in the filing of this document.
7
By:
8
/s/ Kenneth J. Pinto
KENNETH J. PINTO
9
10
11
PROPOSED ORDER
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
15
1. The lawsuit against Defendants is dismissed with prejudice.
16
2. Each party shall pay its own attorneys’ fees and costs in this action.
17
18
19
Dated: 6/7/2018
______________________________________
Hon. Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:17-CV-02620-EJD
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
[F.R.C.P.§§ 41(a)(1)(ii)]
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?