Lindow v. Perkins et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The clerk shall close this file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 9/19/2017. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ROBERT LINDOW, 12 Case No.5:17-cv-02782-HRL Plaintiff, 13 ORDER DISMISSING CASE1 v. 14 MONICA PERKINS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 The court issued an order directing plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be 17 18 dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Dkt. 9). Defendants subsequently moved to 19 dismiss. (Dkt. 10). Plaintiff did not oppose the motion to dismiss; and, at the September 19, 2017 20 show cause hearing he stated that he wished to dismiss this case. Accordingly, this action is 21 dismissed, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The clerk shall close this file. SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: September 19, 2017 24 HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 1 28 All parties have expressly consented that all proceedings in this matter may be heard and finally adjudicated by the undersigned. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c); Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?