Antonio v. Lacoste USA, Inc.
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING #15 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OSC RE: SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/8/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
LARRY W. LEE, State Bar. No. 228175
DIVERSITY LAW GROUP
515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1250
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3316
Telephone:
213.448.6555
Facsimile:
213.488.6554
Email:
lwlee@diversitylaw.com
WILLIAM L. MARDER, State Bar No. 170131
POLARIS LAW GROUP, LLP
501 San Benito Street, Suite 200
Hollister, CA 95023
Telephone:
831.531.4214
Facsimile:
831.634.0333
Email:
bill@polarislawgroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Shawn Antonio
DONNA MO, State Bar No. 240621
JEFFREY WESTON, State Bar No. 309507
ARENT FOX LLP
555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065
Telephone: 213.629.7400
Facsimile:
213.629.7401
Email:
donna.mo@arentfox.com
Email:
jeffrey.weston@arentfox.com
Attorneys for Defendant
LACOSTE USA, INC.
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN JOSE DIVISION
20
21
SHAWN ANTONIO, as an individual and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RENT F OX LLP
Plaintiffs,
v.
LACOSTE USA, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 5:17-cv-02895-EJD
Honorable Edward J. Davila
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING OSC RE:
SETTLEMENT AND JOINT STATEMENT
IN RESPONSE TO OSC
OSC: Re: Settlement
Date:
September 14, 2017
Time:
10:00 a.m.
Proposed New OSC: Re: Settlement
Date:
September 28, 2017
Time:
10:00 a.m.
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING OSC RE: SETTLEMENT
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Shawn Antonio and Defendant Lacoste USA, Inc. (together, the
2
“Parties”) have reached a settlement of Plaintiff’s claims on an individual basis and are in the
3
process of finalizing a written settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”);
4
WHEREAS, on August 4, 2017, the Court scheduled an Order to Show Cause Re:
5
Settlement for September 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. and ordered that a joint statement setting forth
6
settlement efforts be filed by September 7, 2017, as well as the amount of additional time necessary
7
to finalize and file a dismissal;
8
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to the material terms and conditions of the settlement
9
and anticipate finalizing and fully executing a Settlement Agreement and filing a dismissal by
10
September 20, 2017, if not earlier;
11
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their
12
respective counsel, that the Order to Show Cause Re: Settlement be continued to September 28,
13
2017, or until such later date as may be convenient for the Court, to allow sufficient time for
14
//
15
//
16
//
17
//
18
//
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
A RENT F OX LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING OSC RE: SETTLEMENT
1
finalization and execution of the Settlement Agreement, and filing of the dismissal, with a joint
2
statement setting forth settlement efforts to be filed by September 21, 2017.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
5
Dated: September 7, 2017
DIVERSITY LAW GROUP
6
By: s/Larry W. Lee1
7
Larry W. Lee
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHAWN ANTONIO
8
9
10
Dated: September 7, 2017
ARENT FOX LLP
11
By: s/Donna Mo
12
Donna Mo
Jeffrey Weston
Attorneys for Defendant
LACOSTE USA, INC.
13
14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
20
September 8, 2017
Dated:________________
__________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
A RENT F OX LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES
Counsel for Defendant, Donna Mo, is the ECF user filing this document. Ms. Mo attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from Larry W. Lee, the other signatory to this document.
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING OSC RE: SETTLEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?