Regional Medical Center of San Jose v. WH Administrators, Inc et al

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/13/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 1875 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1600 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067-2517 TEL: (310) 551-8111 • FAX: (310) 551-8181 HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, P.C. 10 11 REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN 12 JOSE, Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 17-cv-03357-EJD [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT THE PHIA GROUP’S MOTION TO DISMISS vs. Trial Date: None Set 15 WH ADMINISTRATORS, INC.; RHC MANAGEMENT HEALTH & WELFARE 16 TRUST; RHC MANAGEMENT CO., LLC d/b/a/ MCDONALD’S; BENEFIT 17 ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS, LLC; THE PHIA GROUP, LLC, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17-CV-03357-EJD [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT PHIA GROUP’S MOTION TO DISMISS ORDER 1 2 3 Having read and considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule for Defendant The Phia Group’s Motion to Dismiss, the Court finds good cause to extend the briefing schedule with respect to any motions filed by Defendants in response to the Complaint, as follows: 4 1. 5 Plaintiff shall have until September 4, 2017 to oppose Defendant The Phia Group’s Motion to Dismiss; 6 2. 7 Defendant The Phia Group shall have until September 18, 2017 to file any Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1875 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1600 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067-2517 TEL: (310) 551-8111 • FAX: (310) 551-8181 HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, P.C. 10 11 July 13, 2017 DATED: __________________ HON. JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:17-CV-03357-EJD [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT PHIA GROUP’S MOTION TO DISMISS 1232712.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?