United States of America v. Hiramanek

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Re: Dkt. No. 10 . If Mr. Hiramanek has a factual basis for the Court to consider whether recusal is appropriate, he must present them in a declaration under penalty of perjury filed by 7/5/2017. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/20/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

12
13
14

Case Nos. 17-cv-03389 NC, 17-cv03392 NC

Petitioner,

11
v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ADIL HIRAMANEK,

Re: Dkt. No. 10

Respondent.

15
16
17

The Court has reviewed respondent Adil Hiramanek’s June 20 filing, docket

18

number 10 in case number 17-cv-03389. In it, he states that he is “contemplating an

19

appropriate filing that may require” recusal of the undersigned magistrate judge in these

20

related cases. No facts that would require recusal are presented. If Mr. Hiramanek has a

21

factual basis for the Court to consider whether recusal is appropriate, he must present them

22

in a declaration under penalty of perjury filed by July 5, 2017.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27

Dated: June 20, 2017

_____________________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge

28
Case Nos. 17-cv-03389 NC, 17-cv-03392 NC