Funding Circle USA, Inc. v. DOES 1-30, Inclusive

Filing 10

Order quashing subpoena and order to show cause re: sanctions signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/10/2017. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/24/2017 at 1:30 PM.(hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017)

Download PDF
E-filed 10/10/2017 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 FUNDING CIRCLE USA, INC., Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 Case No.17-cv-03917-HRL v. DOES 1-30, INCLUSIVE, ORDER QUASHING SUBPOENA AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff’s lead counsel, Mark Mao, recently filed with the Court a declaration stating that 13 his firm subpoenaed Yahoo and Google in an effort to identify the as-yet-unknown defendants in 14 this case. Dkt. No. 7. At a subsequent case management conference, an associate from Mr. Mao’s 15 firm confirmed that subpoenas had been served on Yahoo and Google, and that Yahoo had already 16 produced records in response. Dkt. No. 9. 17 Both subpoenas were issued in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d)(1), 18 which prohibits, subject to exceptions not relevant here, the taking of any discovery without a 19 court order before a Rule 26(f) conference. The parties have not engaged in a Rule 26(f) 20 conference, and Plaintiff did not seek leave from the Court to conduct early discovery. 21 Accordingly, the Court orders that the subpoena to Google be quashed. In addition, the 22 Court orders Mr. Mao to appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District Court, 280 23 South First Street, San Jose, California on October 24, 2017 at 1:30 P.M., and show cause, if any, 24 why the Court should not impose sanctions for discovery abuse. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2017 27 28 HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?