Forte-Holmes v. LoanDepot.com, LLC

Filing 10

Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 9 Stipulation extending time for Defendant Loandepot.com, LLC to file its responsive pleading signed on 8/25/2017. (hrllc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2017)

E-filed 8/25/2017

JUSTIN M. PENN (SBN: 302350)
[e-mail]
2 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
222 N. LaSalle, Suite 300
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 312-704-3001
1

4
5

Attorneys for Defendant
LOANDEPOT.COM, LLC

6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE)

11
12

YVONNE FORTE-HOLMES,

13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.
LOANDEPOT.COM, LLC, and DOES 1
through 100 inclusive,
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:17-cv-04075-HRL
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
FOR DEFENDANT
LOANDEPOT.COM, LLC TO FILE
IT'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:
Location:

October 17, 2017
1:30 p.m.
Howard R. Lloyd
2, 5th Floor
280 South First Street
San Jose, CA

Complaint Filed:

July 19, 2017

23

WHEREAS defendant LOANDEPOT.COM, LLC (“defendant”) was served on
24

August 4, 2017 and its responsive pleading is currently due to be filed on or before
25

August 25, 2017;
26
27
28

1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04075-HRL
3439034v1 0969511

1

WHEREAS, counsel for defendant was recently retained, needs additional time to

2

review and investigate the claims and potential defenses, and has a personal trip out of

3

the country planned for September 13, 2017 to September 24, 2017;

4

WHEREAS, the attorneys for plaintiff and defendant have agreed to a mutually

5

agreeable stipulated enlargement of time for defendant to file its responsive pleading of

6

September 27, 2017;

7

NOW therefore, the parties by and through their respective counsel of record,

8

hereby stipulate that defendant shall have an enlargement of time to September 27, 2017

9

in which to file a responsive pleading to the complaint.

10

There have been no previous extensions of time for defendant to respond to

11

plaintiff's complaint. The extension of time will not alter the date of any other event or

12

deadline already fixed by Court order or Local Rule in the schedule for the case.

13
14
15

The parties respectfully submit this Stipulation to the Court pursuant to Local
Rules 6-2(a) and 7-12.
IT IS SO STIPULATED

16
17
18

Dated: August 24, 2017

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

19
20

/s/Justin M. Penn
Attorneys for Defendant LoanDepot.com, LLC

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04075-HRL
3439034v1 0969511

1

Dated: August 24, 2017

SAGARIA LAW, PC

2

/s/Scott Johnson____
Attorneys for Plaintiff Yvonne Forte-Holmes

3
4
5

ORDER

6
7
8
9
10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,
IT IS SO ORDERED

_____________________________
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT
Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd
8/25/2017

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04075-HRL
3439034v1 0969511