Denovo Medical, Inc. et al v. Biotronik, Inc. et al

Filing 94

ORDER GRANTING 93 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES - Responses due by 7/3/2018. Replies due by 7/17/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/14/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2018)

4

DIEMER & WEI, LLP
KATHRYN S. DIEMER, #133977
JULIA M. WEI, #218005
HENRY CHUANG, #250628
100 West San Fernando Street, Suite 555
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff
DeNovo Medical, Inc. and Ronald Fry

1
2
3

6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
10

Plaintiffs,

11

vs.

12
13
14

Case №: 5:17-CV-04195-HRL

DeNovo Medical, Inc. and Ronald Fry

Biotronik, Inc., James Maldonado, Marlou
Janssen, Jake Langer, Paul Woodstock, Peter
Elia, Mike Iversen, Rich Rimmer, John Lacey,
Mike Nitsch, Mike Boras, John Cain, Chris
Mulvanny, and Does 1-50

15

Defendants.

16

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS
MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Date: August 8, 2018
Time: 10:00 A.M.
Dept: 2 – 17th Floor
Judge: William H. Orrick

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

-1-

5:17-cv-04195

1

The parties seek an extension of time to permit Plaintiffs to fully brief their oppositions to

2

Defendants’ motions for attorney fees. Due to the numerous motions set by Defendants for the

3

same day, Plaintiffs’ counsels’ preexisting personal commitments, and for the reasons as stated in

4

the motion for extension, Plaintiffs have been unable to complete their oppositions prior to the

5

deadline.

6

There have been no previous modifications to this motion in this case. Further, the

7

modification to the deadlines for this motion will not impact the schedule for this case as judgment

8

has already been issued and the case is closed.

9

Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 6-2, IT IS

10

HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, through their

11

undersigned attorneys, that:

12

(1) The time for Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Defendants motions for attorney fees entered

13

as docket numbers 85, 86, 87, 88, and 89, be extended from June 12, 2018 until July 3,

14

2018

15
16

(2) The time for Defendants’ reply to Plaintiffs’ opposition be extended from July 19,
2018 until July 17, 2018.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
96261425.1 0047984- 00041

-2-

5:17-CV-04195

1
2

DATED: June 12, 2018

DIEMER & WEI, LLP

3
4

By: /s/ Kathryn S. Diemer
KATHRYN S. DIEMER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DeNovo Medical, Inc. and Ronald Fry

5
6
7

DATED: June 12, 2018

STOEL RIVES LLP

8
9

By:/s/ Edward C. Duckers
EDWARD C. DUCKERS
TODD A. HANCHETT
MARGARET E. DALTON
Attorneys for Defendant
Biotronik, Inc.

10
11
12
13

DATED: June 12, 2018

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP

14
By: /s/ Rita M. Haeusler
RITA M. HAEUSLER
Attorneys for Defendants
James Maldonado, Marlou Janssen, Jake
Langer, Paul Woodstock, Mike Iversen, John
Lacey, Mike Nitsch, and Chris Mulvanny

15
16
17
18
19

DATED: June 12, 2018

MAYNARD, CRONIN, ERIKSON,
CURRAN & REITER LLP

20
21

By: /s/ Michael D. Curran
MICHAEL D. CURRAN
Attorneys for Defendant Richard Rimmer

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
96261425.1 0047984- 00041

-3-

5:17-CV-04195

1

DATED: June 12, 2018

COAST LAW GROUP LLP

2
3

By: /s/ David A. Peck
DAVID A. PECK
Attorneys for Defendant Peter Elia

4
5

DATED: June 12, 2018

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

6
7

By: /s/ Krista M. Enns
KRISTA ENNS
Attorneys for Defendant Mike Boras

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
96261425.1 0047984- 00041

-4-

5:17-CV-04195

1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
3
Based upon the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by the parties, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
4

(1) Plaintiffs’ time to respond to Defendants’ motions for attorney fees be extended until

5
July 3, 2018;
6

(2) Defendants’ time to respond to respond to Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’

7
motions for attorney fees be extended until July 17, 2018.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11

Dated: June 14, 2018

12

HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
96261425.1 0047984- 00041

-5-

5:17-CV-04195