Cardenas v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
Filing
5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Show Cause Response due by 8/14/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/4/2017. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
IRENE CARDENAS,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No.5:17-cv-04382-HRL
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
v.
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Defendants Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC (Rushmore) and U.S. Bank
18
National Association (as trustee for RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT) removed this action here on
19
August 2, 2017, asserting diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal asserts,
20
among other things, that Rushmore “is headquartered in and a resident of Delaware,” and that
21
defendant Summit Management Company, LLC “was and is incorporated in Delaware with its
22
headquarters in Texas.” (Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal ¶¶ 6, 9). The notice goes on to conclude that
23
complete diversity exists because “Plaintiffs reside in California; and the Defendants in this
24
action, are headquartered in or residents of Delaware.” (Id. ¶ 10).
25
For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, LLCs are treated like partnerships. Johnson v.
26
Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). Thus, “like a partnership,
27
an LLC is a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens.” Id. Defendants’
28
notice of removal does not identify the citizenship of all of the owners/members of Rushmore or
1
Summit Management Company, LLC. Thus, the court cannot determine whether subject-matter
2
jurisdiction exists on the basis of diversity of citizenship.
3
Defendants are therefore ordered to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed
4
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A response to this order to show cause is due August 14,
5
2017. Defendants’ response requires evidence, via a declaration or otherwise, that all of the
6
owners/members of the LLCs are diverse in citizenship from plaintiff. Failure to timely provide
7
such evidence will result in remand to the state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
8
SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: August 4, 2017
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
5:17-cv-04382-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Clarisse Jien-Yee Chung
3
Michael James Yesk
4
Peter James Van Zandt peter.vanzandt@leclairryan.com, charmaine.villavert@leclairryan.com,
paul.efstratis@leclairryan.com
5
clarisse@crossroadslegalgroup.com
yesklaw@gmail.com, cc.yesklaw@gmail.com
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?