Cardenas v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al

Filing 5

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Show Cause Response due by 8/14/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/4/2017. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 IRENE CARDENAS, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No.5:17-cv-04382-HRL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., et al., Defendants. Defendants Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC (Rushmore) and U.S. Bank 18 National Association (as trustee for RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT) removed this action here on 19 August 2, 2017, asserting diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal asserts, 20 among other things, that Rushmore “is headquartered in and a resident of Delaware,” and that 21 defendant Summit Management Company, LLC “was and is incorporated in Delaware with its 22 headquarters in Texas.” (Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal ¶¶ 6, 9). The notice goes on to conclude that 23 complete diversity exists because “Plaintiffs reside in California; and the Defendants in this 24 action, are headquartered in or residents of Delaware.” (Id. ¶ 10). 25 For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, LLCs are treated like partnerships. Johnson v. 26 Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). Thus, “like a partnership, 27 an LLC is a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens.” Id. Defendants’ 28 notice of removal does not identify the citizenship of all of the owners/members of Rushmore or 1 Summit Management Company, LLC. Thus, the court cannot determine whether subject-matter 2 jurisdiction exists on the basis of diversity of citizenship. 3 Defendants are therefore ordered to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed 4 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A response to this order to show cause is due August 14, 5 2017. Defendants’ response requires evidence, via a declaration or otherwise, that all of the 6 owners/members of the LLCs are diverse in citizenship from plaintiff. Failure to timely provide 7 such evidence will result in remand to the state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 8 SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: August 4, 2017 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 HOWARD R. LLOYD United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 5:17-cv-04382-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Clarisse Jien-Yee Chung 3 Michael James Yesk 4 Peter James Van Zandt peter.vanzandt@leclairryan.com, charmaine.villavert@leclairryan.com, paul.efstratis@leclairryan.com 5 clarisse@crossroadslegalgroup.com yesklaw@gmail.com, cc.yesklaw@gmail.com 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?