Finjan, Inc. v. Sonicwall, Inc.
Filing
255
Interim Order re 248 Discovery Letter Brief. Further submissions due by 5/4/2020. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 4/28/2020. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2020)
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 255 Filed 04/28/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
FINJAN, INC.,
8
Plaintiff,
9
INTERIM ORDER RE APRIL 17, 2020
JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF
v.
10
SONICWALL, INC.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
Re: Dkt. No. 248
Defendant.
12
13
On April 28, 2020, the Court held a hearing on the parties’ discovery dispute concerning
14
15
plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s assertion of the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product
16
protection over certain documents produced in another Finjan action1 against Cisco Systems, Inc.
17
(“Cisco”). Dkt. No. 248. For the reasons discussed at the hearing, Finjan shall submit all disputed
18
documents listed on Finjan’s privilege log (excluding listed deposition testimony that merely
19
discusses the contents of a listed document) for in camera review by May 4, 2020. The disputed
20
documents shall be submitted in electronic form to VKDcrd@cand.uscourts.gov. The submitted
21
documents should include highlighting to indicate which portions have been redacted on
22
privileged or work product grounds.
23
To assist the Court in determining whether Finjan waived work product protection, the
24
parties shall submit the evidence on which they rely for their respective contentions that at the
25
time the disputed documents were disclosed to Cisco’s board observer, Yoav Samet, Cisco and
26
Mr. Samet did or did not have an obligation to maintain the disputed documents in confidence,
27
28
1
Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 5:17-cv00072-BLF-SVK (N.D. Cal.).
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 255 Filed 04/28/20 Page 2 of 2
1
and/or that the disputed documents were or were not disclosed to Mr. Samet in a manner that
2
would enable an adversary to gain access to the information. The parties shall make these
3
submissions by filing supplemental attorney declaration(s) identifying and attaching the evidence,
4
without further argument. The Court requests that the parties submit their declarations with
5
attached evidence by May 4, 2020.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 28, 2020
8
9
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
United States Magistrate Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?